Ford EcoSport vs Nissan NP300 Hardbody

In-depth comparison in South Africa covering price, performance, fuel efficiency, safety, practicality and long-term ownership costs.

Ford EcoSport in South Africa

Ford EcoSport

1.0 EcoBoost Titanium Automatic Petrol Automatic
ZAR 395,000 ex-showroom
⚡ 92 kW (123 hp)
🔧 170 Nm
⛽ 17.2 km/l
VS
Nissan NP300 Hardbody in South Africa

Nissan NP300 Hardbody

2.5 TDi Double Cab Hi-Rider 4x4 Automatic Diesel Automatic
ZAR 529,900 ex-showroom
⚡ 98 kW (131 hp)
🔧 304 Nm
⛽ 11.4 km/l
+

Add a 3rd car to compare

Quick Winners

Performance NP300 Hardbody
Mileage EcoSport
🔑 Ownership EcoSport

Overall Comparison Score

🏆 Winner
#1

EcoSport

63
/ 100
+14
pts
#2

NP300 Hardbody

49
/ 100

Moderate difference between the models.

Executive Summary

EcoSport has a slight advantage, but NP300 Hardbody remains highly competitive.

Key Differences At A Glance

Performance NP300 Hardbody +2 pts
Efficiency EcoSport +2 pts
Safety EcoSport +6 pts
Practicality EcoSport +4 pts
Ownership EcoSport +4 pts

Category Score Breakdown

🏆 Overall Winner

EcoSport

Performance 8/20
Efficiency 9/20
Safety 18/20
Practicality 12/20
Ownership 16/20

NP300 Hardbody

Performance 10/20
Efficiency 7/20
Safety 12/20
Practicality 8/20
Ownership 12/20

Pros & Cons

🏆 Overall Winner

EcoSport

Pros
  • Better fuel efficiency
  • Stronger safety package
  • More practical for daily use
  • Better long-term ownership value
Cons
  • Less powerful engine setup
Best For: Fuel Efficiency Family Usage

NP300 Hardbody

Pros
  • More powerful engine output
Cons
  • Lower fuel efficiency
  • Less comprehensive safety features
  • Less practical in daily usage
  • Shorter warranty coverage
Best For: Highway Driving

Who Should Buy Which?

EcoSport

  • Buyers looking for better fuel efficiency
  • Families prioritising stronger safety equipment
  • Large families needing more practicality and usability
  • Long-term owners valuing warranty and ownership peace of mind

NP300 Hardbody

  • Drivers who prioritise strong highway performance and overtaking power

Full Specification Comparison

Specification EcoSport NP300 Hardbody
Ground Clearance 200 215
Wheelbase 2519 2500
Length 4325 4875
Width 1765 1760
Height 1653 1655
Kerb Weight 1290 1395
Gross Vehicle Weight 1740 2400
Seating Capacity 5 5
Boot Space 352 Not Applicable
Towing Capacity 950 2500
Front Track Width - 1495
Rear Track Width - 1490
Turning Radius - 5.8
Load Bed Length - 1907
Load Bed Width - 1454
Specification EcoSport NP300 Hardbody
Engine 1.0L EcoBoost Turbo Petrol 2.5L Turbocharged Diesel
Engine Type Inline 3 Turbocharged Inline 4 Cylinder Turbocharged
Displacement 998 2488
Cylinders 3 4
Valves per Cylinder 4 4
Power 92 98
Torque 170 304
Fuel System Direct Injection Common Rail Direct Injection
Top Speed 185 168
0-100 km/h 10.5 12.5
Power @ RPM - 3600 rpm
Torque @ RPM - 1750-2500 rpm
Turbocharger - Single Turbo
Compression Ratio - 17.5:1
Engine Position - Front Longitudinal

Final Verdict

🏆 Ford EcoSport wins with 63 pts vs 49 pts for NP300 Hardbody

In structured scoring, EcoSport emerges as the stronger overall package. However, NP300 Hardbody may appeal to buyers prioritising different factors. Ultimately, the right choice depends on your driving priorities in South Africa.

People Also Compare

Popular comparisons among buyers considering similar options.

Frequently Asked Questions

Based on structured category scoring, EcoSport performs better overall in South Africa. However, final choice depends on driving priorities.

EcoSport scores 9 while NP300 Hardbody scores 7 in efficiency. Real-world mileage may vary based on driving conditions.

In safety scoring, EcoSport scores 18 and NP300 Hardbody scores 12. Both offer competitive safety packages in this segment.

EcoSport scores 16 versus NP300 Hardbody scoring 12. Warranty coverage and ownership value influence this result.

Practicality scoring gives EcoSport 12 and NP300 Hardbody 8, reflecting cabin space and usability.

Performance category shows EcoSport scoring 8 compared to NP300 Hardbody scoring 10, indicating stronger overtaking capability.

While resale depends on market demand, ownership and brand positioning suggest EcoSport may hold stronger long-term value.

Off-road suitability depends on drivetrain and ground clearance. Refer to the full specification comparison for detailed technical differences.

Efficiency and ownership categories influence running costs. EcoSport performs slightly stronger overall in structured scoring.

Value depends on feature set, performance and ownership coverage. Structured comparison gives EcoSport the overall advantage.

Detailed Comparison Analysis

The comparison between EcoSport and NP300 Hardbody in South Africa evaluates performance, efficiency, safety, practicality and long-term ownership value.

Performance: EcoSport scores 8 vs 10.

Efficiency: EcoSport scores 9 vs 7.

Safety: EcoSport scores 18 vs 12.

Practicality: EcoSport scores 12 vs 8.

Ownership: EcoSport scores 16 vs 12.

Final structured scoring gives EcoSport the advantage in this comparison.