Ford EcoSport vs Nissan NP200

In-depth comparison in South Africa covering price, performance, fuel efficiency, safety, practicality and long-term ownership costs.

Ford EcoSport in South Africa

Ford EcoSport

1.0 EcoBoost Titanium Automatic Petrol Automatic
ZAR 395,000 ex-showroom
⚡ 92 kW (123 hp)
🔧 170 Nm
⛽ 17.2 km/l
VS
Nissan NP200 in South Africa

Nissan NP200

1.6 Safety Pack Manual Petrol Manual
ZAR 284,900 ex-showroom
⚡ 65 kW (87 hp)
🔧 147 Nm
⛽ 12.5 km/l
+

Add a 3rd car to compare

Quick Winners

Performance EcoSport
Mileage EcoSport
🔑 Ownership EcoSport

Overall Comparison Score

🏆 Winner
#1

EcoSport

63
/ 100
+18
pts
#2

NP200

45
/ 100

Moderate difference between the models.

Executive Summary

EcoSport holds a noticeable edge over NP200, especially in key ownership areas.

Key Differences At A Glance

Performance EcoSport +2 pts
Efficiency EcoSport +1 pts
Safety EcoSport +6 pts
Practicality EcoSport +5 pts
Ownership EcoSport +4 pts

Category Score Breakdown

🏆 Overall Winner

EcoSport

Performance 8/20
Efficiency 9/20
Safety 18/20
Practicality 12/20
Ownership 16/20

NP200

Performance 6/20
Efficiency 8/20
Safety 12/20
Practicality 7/20
Ownership 12/20

Pros & Cons

🏆 Overall Winner

EcoSport

Pros
  • More powerful engine output
  • Better fuel efficiency
  • Stronger safety package
  • More practical for daily use
  • Better long-term ownership value
Cons
  • No major weaknesses identified
Best For: Highway Driving Fuel Efficiency Family Usage

NP200

Pros
  • No major strengths identified
Cons
  • Less powerful engine setup
  • Lower fuel efficiency
  • Less comprehensive safety features
  • Less practical in daily usage
  • Shorter warranty coverage
Best For: General Use

Who Should Buy Which?

EcoSport

  • Drivers who prioritise strong highway performance and overtaking power
  • Buyers looking for better fuel efficiency
  • Families prioritising stronger safety equipment
  • Large families needing more practicality and usability
  • Long-term owners valuing warranty and ownership peace of mind

NP200

  • Buyers looking for a balanced all-round vehicle

Full Specification Comparison

Specification EcoSport NP200
Ground Clearance 200 185
Wheelbase 2519 2400
Length 4325 4535
Width 1765 1615
Height 1653 1530
Kerb Weight 1290 915
Gross Vehicle Weight 1740 1570
Seating Capacity 5 2
Boot Space 352 Not Applicable
Towing Capacity 950 500
Front Track Width - 1390
Rear Track Width - 1385
Turning Radius - 5.5
Load Bed Length - 1815
Load Bed Width - 1530
Specification EcoSport NP200
Engine 1.0L EcoBoost Turbo Petrol 1.6L Naturally Aspirated Petrol
Engine Type Inline 3 Turbocharged Inline 4 Cylinder
Displacement 998 1598
Cylinders 3 4
Valves per Cylinder 4 4
Power 92 65
Torque 170 147
Fuel System Direct Injection Multi-Point Injection
Top Speed 185 155
0-100 km/h 10.5 14.5
Power @ RPM - 5200 rpm
Torque @ RPM - 2800 rpm
Turbocharger - Not Available
Compression Ratio - 9.5:1
Engine Position - Front Longitudinal

Final Verdict

🏆 Ford EcoSport wins with 63 pts vs 45 pts for NP200

In structured scoring, EcoSport emerges as the stronger overall package. However, NP200 may appeal to buyers prioritising different factors. Ultimately, the right choice depends on your driving priorities in South Africa.

People Also Compare

Popular comparisons among buyers considering similar options.

Frequently Asked Questions

Based on structured category scoring, EcoSport performs better overall in South Africa. However, final choice depends on driving priorities.

EcoSport scores 9 while NP200 scores 8 in efficiency. Real-world mileage may vary based on driving conditions.

In safety scoring, EcoSport scores 18 and NP200 scores 12. Both offer competitive safety packages in this segment.

EcoSport scores 16 versus NP200 scoring 12. Warranty coverage and ownership value influence this result.

Practicality scoring gives EcoSport 12 and NP200 7, reflecting cabin space and usability.

Performance category shows EcoSport scoring 8 compared to NP200 scoring 6, indicating stronger overtaking capability.

While resale depends on market demand, ownership and brand positioning suggest EcoSport may hold stronger long-term value.

Off-road suitability depends on drivetrain and ground clearance. Refer to the full specification comparison for detailed technical differences.

Efficiency and ownership categories influence running costs. EcoSport performs slightly stronger overall in structured scoring.

Value depends on feature set, performance and ownership coverage. Structured comparison gives EcoSport the overall advantage.

Detailed Comparison Analysis

The comparison between EcoSport and NP200 in South Africa evaluates performance, efficiency, safety, practicality and long-term ownership value.

Performance: EcoSport scores 8 vs 6.

Efficiency: EcoSport scores 9 vs 8.

Safety: EcoSport scores 18 vs 12.

Practicality: EcoSport scores 12 vs 7.

Ownership: EcoSport scores 16 vs 12.

Final structured scoring gives EcoSport the advantage in this comparison.