Ford EcoSport vs Toyota Land Cruiser 300

In-depth comparison in South Africa covering price, performance, fuel efficiency, safety, practicality and long-term ownership costs.

Ford EcoSport in South Africa

Ford EcoSport

1.0 EcoBoost Titanium Automatic Petrol Automatic
ZAR 395,000 ex-showroom
⚡ 92 kW (123 hp)
🔧 170 Nm
⛽ 17.2 km/l
VS
Toyota Land Cruiser 300 in South Africa

Toyota Land Cruiser 300

3.3D VX-R 4x4 Automatic Diesel Automatic
ZAR 2,149,900 ex-showroom
⚡ 227 kW (304 hp)
🔧 700 Nm
⛽ 9.4 km/l
+

Add a 3rd car to compare

Quick Winners

Performance Land Cruiser 300
Mileage EcoSport
🔑 Ownership EcoSport

Overall Comparison Score

🏆 Winner
#1

Land Cruiser 300

70
/ 100
+7
pts
#2

EcoSport

63
/ 100

Very close match. Final decision depends on buyer preference.

Executive Summary

Both EcoSport and Land Cruiser 300 are extremely closely matched, making the final choice dependent on buyer preference.

Key Differences At A Glance

Performance Land Cruiser 300 +12 pts
Efficiency EcoSport +4 pts
Safety Land Cruiser 300 +2 pts
Practicality Land Cruiser 300 +1 pts
Ownership EcoSport +4 pts

Category Score Breakdown

🏆 Overall Winner

Land Cruiser 300

Performance 20/20
Efficiency 5/20
Safety 20/20
Practicality 13/20
Ownership 12/20

EcoSport

Performance 8/20
Efficiency 9/20
Safety 18/20
Practicality 12/20
Ownership 16/20

Pros & Cons

EcoSport

Pros
  • Better fuel efficiency
  • Better long-term ownership value
Cons
  • Less powerful engine setup
  • Less comprehensive safety features
  • Less practical in daily usage
Best For: Fuel Efficiency
🏆 Overall Winner

Land Cruiser 300

Pros
  • More powerful engine output
  • Stronger safety package
  • More practical for daily use
Cons
  • Lower fuel efficiency
  • Shorter warranty coverage
Best For: Highway Driving Family Usage

Who Should Buy Which?

EcoSport

  • Buyers looking for better fuel efficiency
  • Long-term owners valuing warranty and ownership peace of mind

Land Cruiser 300

  • Drivers who prioritise strong highway performance and overtaking power
  • Families prioritising stronger safety equipment
  • Large families needing more practicality and usability

Full Specification Comparison

Specification EcoSport Land Cruiser 300
Ground Clearance 200 235
Wheelbase 2519 2850
Length 4325 4985
Width 1765 1980
Height 1653 1910
Kerb Weight 1290 2430
Gross Vehicle Weight 1740 3300
Seating Capacity 5 7
Boot Space 352 309
Towing Capacity 950 3500
Front Track Width - 1675
Rear Track Width - 1675
Turning Radius - 6.0
Specification EcoSport Land Cruiser 300
Engine 1.0L EcoBoost Turbo Petrol 3.3L Twin-Turbo V6 Diesel
Engine Type Inline 3 Turbocharged V6 Twin-Turbocharged DOHC
Displacement 998 3346
Cylinders 3 6
Valves per Cylinder 4 4
Power 92 227
Torque 170 700
Fuel System Direct Injection Common Rail Direct Injection
Top Speed 185 210
0-100 km/h 10.5 7.5
Power @ RPM - 3000-3600 rpm
Torque @ RPM - 1600-2600 rpm
Turbocharger - Twin Turbo
Compression Ratio - 15.4:1
Engine Position - Front Longitudinal

Final Verdict

🏆 Toyota Land Cruiser 300 wins with 70 pts vs 63 pts for EcoSport

In structured scoring, Land Cruiser 300 emerges as the stronger overall package. However, EcoSport may appeal to buyers prioritising different factors. Ultimately, the right choice depends on your driving priorities in South Africa.

People Also Compare

Popular comparisons among buyers considering similar options.

Frequently Asked Questions

Based on structured category scoring, Land Cruiser 300 performs better overall in South Africa. However, final choice depends on driving priorities.

EcoSport scores 9 while Land Cruiser 300 scores 5 in efficiency. Real-world mileage may vary based on driving conditions.

In safety scoring, EcoSport scores 18 and Land Cruiser 300 scores 20. Both offer competitive safety packages in this segment.

EcoSport scores 16 versus Land Cruiser 300 scoring 12. Warranty coverage and ownership value influence this result.

Practicality scoring gives EcoSport 12 and Land Cruiser 300 13, reflecting cabin space and usability.

Performance category shows EcoSport scoring 8 compared to Land Cruiser 300 scoring 20, indicating stronger overtaking capability.

While resale depends on market demand, ownership and brand positioning suggest Land Cruiser 300 may hold stronger long-term value.

Off-road suitability depends on drivetrain and ground clearance. Refer to the full specification comparison for detailed technical differences.

Efficiency and ownership categories influence running costs. Land Cruiser 300 performs slightly stronger overall in structured scoring.

Value depends on feature set, performance and ownership coverage. Structured comparison gives Land Cruiser 300 the overall advantage.

Detailed Comparison Analysis

The comparison between EcoSport and Land Cruiser 300 in South Africa evaluates performance, efficiency, safety, practicality and long-term ownership value.

Performance: EcoSport scores 8 vs 20.

Efficiency: EcoSport scores 9 vs 5.

Safety: EcoSport scores 18 vs 20.

Practicality: EcoSport scores 12 vs 13.

Ownership: EcoSport scores 16 vs 12.

Final structured scoring gives Land Cruiser 300 the advantage in this comparison.