Isuzu D-Max vs Ford Puma

In-depth comparison in South Africa covering price, performance, fuel efficiency, safety, practicality and long-term ownership costs.

Isuzu D-Max in South Africa

Isuzu D-Max

3.0 DDi Double Cab 4x4 LSE AT Diesel Automatic
ZAR 887,000 ex-showroom
⚡ 140 kW (188 hp)
🔧 450 Nm
⛽ 12.9 km/l
VS
Ford Puma in South Africa

Ford Puma

1.0T EcoBoost ST-Line Automatic Petrol Automatic
ZAR 459,900 ex-showroom
⚡ 92 kW (123 hp)
🔧 170 Nm
⛽ 16.4 km/l
+

Add a 3rd car to compare

Quick Winners

Performance D-Max
Mileage Puma
🔑 Ownership D-Max

Overall Comparison Score

🏆 Winner
#1

D-Max

69
/ 100
+8
pts
#2

Puma

61
/ 100

Very close match. Final decision depends on buyer preference.

Executive Summary

D-Max has a slight advantage, but Puma remains highly competitive.

Key Differences At A Glance

Performance D-Max +7 pts
Efficiency Puma +2 pts
Safety Puma +2 pts
Practicality Puma +3 pts
Ownership D-Max +8 pts

Category Score Breakdown

🏆 Overall Winner

D-Max

Performance 15/20
Efficiency 7/20
Safety 18/20
Practicality 9/20
Ownership 20/20

Puma

Performance 8/20
Efficiency 9/20
Safety 20/20
Practicality 12/20
Ownership 12/20

Pros & Cons

🏆 Overall Winner

D-Max

Pros
  • More powerful engine output
  • Better long-term ownership value
Cons
  • Lower fuel efficiency
  • Less comprehensive safety features
  • Less practical in daily usage
Best For: Highway Driving

Puma

Pros
  • Better fuel efficiency
  • Stronger safety package
  • More practical for daily use
Cons
  • Less powerful engine setup
  • Shorter warranty coverage
Best For: Fuel Efficiency Family Usage

Who Should Buy Which?

D-Max

  • Drivers who prioritise strong highway performance and overtaking power
  • Long-term owners valuing warranty and ownership peace of mind

Puma

  • Buyers looking for better fuel efficiency
  • Families prioritising stronger safety equipment
  • Large families needing more practicality and usability

Full Specification Comparison

Specification D-Max Puma
Ground Clearance 240 170
Wheelbase 3125 2594
Length 5310 4186
Width 1870 1805
Height 1810 1531
Kerb Weight 2050 1325
Gross Vehicle Weight 3100 1775
Seating Capacity 5 5
Boot Space 0 456
Towing Capacity 3500 1200
Front Track Width - 1541
Rear Track Width - 1534
Turning Radius - 5.4
Specification D-Max Puma
Engine 3.0L Ddi Turbo Diesel 1.0L EcoBoost Mild Hybrid
Engine Type Inline 4 Turbocharged Inline 3 Cylinder Turbo Mild Hybrid
Displacement 2999 999
Cylinders 4 3
Valves per Cylinder 4 4
Power 140 92
Torque 450 170
Fuel System Common Rail Direct Injection Direct Injection
Top Speed 180 185
0-100 km/h 10.8 10.5
Power @ RPM - 6000 rpm
Torque @ RPM - 2000-4500 rpm
Turbocharger - Single Turbo
Compression Ratio - 10.5:1
Engine Position - Front Transverse

Final Verdict

🏆 Isuzu D-Max wins with 69 pts vs 61 pts for Puma

In structured scoring, D-Max emerges as the stronger overall package. However, Puma may appeal to buyers prioritising different factors. Ultimately, the right choice depends on your driving priorities in South Africa.

People Also Compare

Popular comparisons among buyers considering similar options.

Frequently Asked Questions

Based on structured category scoring, D-Max performs better overall in South Africa. However, final choice depends on driving priorities.

D-Max scores 7 while Puma scores 9 in efficiency. Real-world mileage may vary based on driving conditions.

In safety scoring, D-Max scores 18 and Puma scores 20. Both offer competitive safety packages in this segment.

D-Max scores 20 versus Puma scoring 12. Warranty coverage and ownership value influence this result.

Practicality scoring gives D-Max 9 and Puma 12, reflecting cabin space and usability.

Performance category shows D-Max scoring 15 compared to Puma scoring 8, indicating stronger overtaking capability.

While resale depends on market demand, ownership and brand positioning suggest D-Max may hold stronger long-term value.

Off-road suitability depends on drivetrain and ground clearance. Refer to the full specification comparison for detailed technical differences.

Efficiency and ownership categories influence running costs. D-Max performs slightly stronger overall in structured scoring.

Value depends on feature set, performance and ownership coverage. Structured comparison gives D-Max the overall advantage.

Detailed Comparison Analysis

The comparison between D-Max and Puma in South Africa evaluates performance, efficiency, safety, practicality and long-term ownership value.

Performance: D-Max scores 15 vs 8.

Efficiency: D-Max scores 7 vs 9.

Safety: D-Max scores 18 vs 20.

Practicality: D-Max scores 9 vs 12.

Ownership: D-Max scores 20 vs 12.

Final structured scoring gives D-Max the advantage in this comparison.