Isuzu D-Max vs Nissan NP300 Hardbody

In-depth comparison in South Africa covering price, performance, fuel efficiency, safety, practicality and long-term ownership costs.

Isuzu D-Max in South Africa

Isuzu D-Max

3.0 DDi Double Cab 4x4 LSE AT Diesel Automatic
ZAR 887,000 ex-showroom
⚡ 140 kW (188 hp)
🔧 450 Nm
⛽ 12.9 km/l
VS
Nissan NP300 Hardbody in South Africa

Nissan NP300 Hardbody

2.5 TDi Double Cab Hi-Rider 4x4 Automatic Diesel Automatic
ZAR 529,900 ex-showroom
⚡ 98 kW (131 hp)
🔧 304 Nm
⛽ 11.4 km/l
+

Add a 3rd car to compare

Quick Winners

Performance D-Max
Mileage Tie
🔑 Ownership D-Max

Overall Comparison Score

🏆 Winner
#1

D-Max

69
/ 100
+20
pts
#2

NP300 Hardbody

49
/ 100

Moderate difference between the models.

Executive Summary

D-Max holds a noticeable edge over NP300 Hardbody, especially in key ownership areas.

Key Differences At A Glance

Performance D-Max +5 pts
Efficiency Equal
Safety D-Max +6 pts
Practicality D-Max +1 pts
Ownership D-Max +8 pts

Category Score Breakdown

🏆 Overall Winner

D-Max

Performance 15/20
Efficiency 7/20
Safety 18/20
Practicality 9/20
Ownership 20/20

NP300 Hardbody

Performance 10/20
Efficiency 7/20
Safety 12/20
Practicality 8/20
Ownership 12/20

Pros & Cons

🏆 Overall Winner

D-Max

Pros
  • More powerful engine output
  • Stronger safety package
  • More practical for daily use
  • Better long-term ownership value
Cons
  • No major weaknesses identified
Best For: Highway Driving Family Usage

NP300 Hardbody

Pros
  • No major strengths identified
Cons
  • Less powerful engine setup
  • Less comprehensive safety features
  • Less practical in daily usage
  • Shorter warranty coverage
Best For: General Use

Who Should Buy Which?

D-Max

  • Drivers who prioritise strong highway performance and overtaking power
  • Families prioritising stronger safety equipment
  • Large families needing more practicality and usability
  • Long-term owners valuing warranty and ownership peace of mind

NP300 Hardbody

  • Buyers looking for a balanced all-round vehicle

Full Specification Comparison

Specification D-Max NP300 Hardbody
Ground Clearance 240 215
Wheelbase 3125 2500
Length 5310 4875
Width 1870 1760
Height 1810 1655
Kerb Weight 2050 1395
Gross Vehicle Weight 3100 2400
Seating Capacity 5 5
Boot Space 0 Not Applicable
Towing Capacity 3500 2500
Front Track Width - 1495
Rear Track Width - 1490
Turning Radius - 5.8
Load Bed Length - 1907
Load Bed Width - 1454
Specification D-Max NP300 Hardbody
Engine 3.0L Ddi Turbo Diesel 2.5L Turbocharged Diesel
Engine Type Inline 4 Turbocharged Inline 4 Cylinder Turbocharged
Displacement 2999 2488
Cylinders 4 4
Valves per Cylinder 4 4
Power 140 98
Torque 450 304
Fuel System Common Rail Direct Injection Common Rail Direct Injection
Top Speed 180 168
0-100 km/h 10.8 12.5
Power @ RPM - 3600 rpm
Torque @ RPM - 1750-2500 rpm
Turbocharger - Single Turbo
Compression Ratio - 17.5:1
Engine Position - Front Longitudinal

Final Verdict

🏆 Isuzu D-Max wins with 69 pts vs 49 pts for NP300 Hardbody

In structured scoring, D-Max emerges as the stronger overall package. However, NP300 Hardbody may appeal to buyers prioritising different factors. Ultimately, the right choice depends on your driving priorities in South Africa.

People Also Compare

Popular comparisons among buyers considering similar options.

Frequently Asked Questions

Based on structured category scoring, D-Max performs better overall in South Africa. However, final choice depends on driving priorities.

D-Max scores 7 while NP300 Hardbody scores 7 in efficiency. Real-world mileage may vary based on driving conditions.

In safety scoring, D-Max scores 18 and NP300 Hardbody scores 12. Both offer competitive safety packages in this segment.

D-Max scores 20 versus NP300 Hardbody scoring 12. Warranty coverage and ownership value influence this result.

Practicality scoring gives D-Max 9 and NP300 Hardbody 8, reflecting cabin space and usability.

Performance category shows D-Max scoring 15 compared to NP300 Hardbody scoring 10, indicating stronger overtaking capability.

While resale depends on market demand, ownership and brand positioning suggest D-Max may hold stronger long-term value.

Off-road suitability depends on drivetrain and ground clearance. Refer to the full specification comparison for detailed technical differences.

Efficiency and ownership categories influence running costs. D-Max performs slightly stronger overall in structured scoring.

Value depends on feature set, performance and ownership coverage. Structured comparison gives D-Max the overall advantage.

Detailed Comparison Analysis

The comparison between D-Max and NP300 Hardbody in South Africa evaluates performance, efficiency, safety, practicality and long-term ownership value.

Performance: D-Max scores 15 vs 10.

Efficiency: D-Max scores 7 vs 7.

Safety: D-Max scores 18 vs 12.

Practicality: D-Max scores 9 vs 8.

Ownership: D-Max scores 20 vs 12.

Final structured scoring gives D-Max the advantage in this comparison.