Isuzu D-Max vs Nissan NP200

In-depth comparison in South Africa covering price, performance, fuel efficiency, safety, practicality and long-term ownership costs.

Isuzu D-Max in South Africa

Isuzu D-Max

3.0 DDi Double Cab 4x4 LSE AT Diesel Automatic
ZAR 887,000 ex-showroom
⚡ 140 kW (188 hp)
🔧 450 Nm
⛽ 12.9 km/l
VS
Nissan NP200 in South Africa

Nissan NP200

1.6 Safety Pack Manual Petrol Manual
ZAR 284,900 ex-showroom
⚡ 65 kW (87 hp)
🔧 147 Nm
⛽ 12.5 km/l
+

Add a 3rd car to compare

Quick Winners

Performance D-Max
Mileage NP200
🔑 Ownership D-Max

Overall Comparison Score

🏆 Winner
#1

D-Max

69
/ 100
+24
pts
#2

NP200

45
/ 100

Moderate difference between the models.

Executive Summary

D-Max holds a noticeable edge over NP200, especially in key ownership areas.

Key Differences At A Glance

Performance D-Max +9 pts
Efficiency NP200 +1 pts
Safety D-Max +6 pts
Practicality D-Max +2 pts
Ownership D-Max +8 pts

Category Score Breakdown

🏆 Overall Winner

D-Max

Performance 15/20
Efficiency 7/20
Safety 18/20
Practicality 9/20
Ownership 20/20

NP200

Performance 6/20
Efficiency 8/20
Safety 12/20
Practicality 7/20
Ownership 12/20

Pros & Cons

🏆 Overall Winner

D-Max

Pros
  • More powerful engine output
  • Stronger safety package
  • More practical for daily use
  • Better long-term ownership value
Cons
  • Lower fuel efficiency
Best For: Highway Driving Family Usage

NP200

Pros
  • Better fuel efficiency
Cons
  • Less powerful engine setup
  • Less comprehensive safety features
  • Less practical in daily usage
  • Shorter warranty coverage
Best For: Fuel Efficiency

Who Should Buy Which?

D-Max

  • Drivers who prioritise strong highway performance and overtaking power
  • Families prioritising stronger safety equipment
  • Large families needing more practicality and usability
  • Long-term owners valuing warranty and ownership peace of mind

NP200

  • Buyers looking for better fuel efficiency

Full Specification Comparison

Specification D-Max NP200
Ground Clearance 240 185
Wheelbase 3125 2400
Length 5310 4535
Width 1870 1615
Height 1810 1530
Kerb Weight 2050 915
Gross Vehicle Weight 3100 1570
Seating Capacity 5 2
Boot Space 0 Not Applicable
Towing Capacity 3500 500
Front Track Width - 1390
Rear Track Width - 1385
Turning Radius - 5.5
Load Bed Length - 1815
Load Bed Width - 1530
Specification D-Max NP200
Engine 3.0L Ddi Turbo Diesel 1.6L Naturally Aspirated Petrol
Engine Type Inline 4 Turbocharged Inline 4 Cylinder
Displacement 2999 1598
Cylinders 4 4
Valves per Cylinder 4 4
Power 140 65
Torque 450 147
Fuel System Common Rail Direct Injection Multi-Point Injection
Top Speed 180 155
0-100 km/h 10.8 14.5
Power @ RPM - 5200 rpm
Torque @ RPM - 2800 rpm
Turbocharger - Not Available
Compression Ratio - 9.5:1
Engine Position - Front Longitudinal

Final Verdict

🏆 Isuzu D-Max wins with 69 pts vs 45 pts for NP200

In structured scoring, D-Max emerges as the stronger overall package. However, NP200 may appeal to buyers prioritising different factors. Ultimately, the right choice depends on your driving priorities in South Africa.

People Also Compare

Popular comparisons among buyers considering similar options.

Frequently Asked Questions

Based on structured category scoring, D-Max performs better overall in South Africa. However, final choice depends on driving priorities.

D-Max scores 7 while NP200 scores 8 in efficiency. Real-world mileage may vary based on driving conditions.

In safety scoring, D-Max scores 18 and NP200 scores 12. Both offer competitive safety packages in this segment.

D-Max scores 20 versus NP200 scoring 12. Warranty coverage and ownership value influence this result.

Practicality scoring gives D-Max 9 and NP200 7, reflecting cabin space and usability.

Performance category shows D-Max scoring 15 compared to NP200 scoring 6, indicating stronger overtaking capability.

While resale depends on market demand, ownership and brand positioning suggest D-Max may hold stronger long-term value.

Off-road suitability depends on drivetrain and ground clearance. Refer to the full specification comparison for detailed technical differences.

Efficiency and ownership categories influence running costs. D-Max performs slightly stronger overall in structured scoring.

Value depends on feature set, performance and ownership coverage. Structured comparison gives D-Max the overall advantage.

Detailed Comparison Analysis

The comparison between D-Max and NP200 in South Africa evaluates performance, efficiency, safety, practicality and long-term ownership value.

Performance: D-Max scores 15 vs 6.

Efficiency: D-Max scores 7 vs 8.

Safety: D-Max scores 18 vs 12.

Practicality: D-Max scores 9 vs 7.

Ownership: D-Max scores 20 vs 12.

Final structured scoring gives D-Max the advantage in this comparison.