Honda CR-V vs Toyota Starlet Cross

In-depth comparison in South Africa covering price, performance, fuel efficiency, safety, practicality and long-term ownership costs.

Honda CR-V in South Africa

Honda CR-V

2.0 Hybrid e:HEV Hybrid Automatic
ZAR 819,900 ex-showroom
⚡ 204 kW (274 hp)
🔧 335 Nm
⛽ 20 km/l
VS
Toyota Starlet Cross in South Africa

Toyota Starlet Cross

1.5 XR CVT Petrol Automatic
ZAR 375,900 ex-showroom
⚡ 88 kW (118 hp)
🔧 140 Nm
⛽ 14.5 km/l
+

Add a 3rd car to compare

Quick Winners

Performance CR-V
Mileage CR-V
🔑 Ownership Tie

Overall Comparison Score

🏆 Winner
#1

CR-V

77
/ 100
+21
pts
#2

Starlet Cross

56
/ 100

Moderate difference between the models.

Executive Summary

CR-V holds a noticeable edge over Starlet Cross, especially in key ownership areas.

Key Differences At A Glance

Performance CR-V +10 pts
Efficiency CR-V +8 pts
Safety Equal
Practicality CR-V +3 pts
Ownership Equal

Category Score Breakdown

🏆 Overall Winner

CR-V

Performance 17/20
Efficiency 16/20
Safety 18/20
Practicality 14/20
Ownership 12/20

Starlet Cross

Performance 7/20
Efficiency 8/20
Safety 18/20
Practicality 11/20
Ownership 12/20

Pros & Cons

🏆 Overall Winner

CR-V

Pros
  • More powerful engine output
  • Better fuel efficiency
  • More practical for daily use
Cons
  • No major weaknesses identified
Best For: Highway Driving Fuel Efficiency Family Usage

Starlet Cross

Pros
  • No major strengths identified
Cons
  • Less powerful engine setup
  • Lower fuel efficiency
  • Less practical in daily usage
Best For: General Use

Who Should Buy Which?

CR-V

  • Drivers who prioritise strong highway performance and overtaking power
  • Buyers looking for better fuel efficiency
  • Large families needing more practicality and usability

Starlet Cross

  • Buyers looking for a balanced all-round vehicle

Full Specification Comparison

Specification CR-V Starlet Cross
Ground Clearance 200 185
Wheelbase 2700 2620
Length 4690 4320
Width 1860 1795
Height 1690 1620
Kerb Weight 1750 1120
Gross Vehicle Weight 2250 1520
Seating Capacity 5 5
Boot Space 497 290
Towing Capacity 1500 Not Rated
Front Track Width - 1520
Rear Track Width - 1510
Turning Radius - 5.2
Specification CR-V Starlet Cross
Engine 2.0L Hybrid Petrol 1.5L Naturally Aspirated Petrol
Engine Type Inline 4 Cylinder Atkinson Cycle with Dual Electric Motors Inline 4-cylinder 2NR-VE
Displacement 1993 1496
Cylinders 4 4
Valves per Cylinder 4 4
Power 204 88
Torque 335 140
Fuel System Direct Injection + Electric Motor Assist Multi-Point Injection
Top Speed 195 170
0-100 km/h 8.5 11.8
Power @ RPM - 6000 rpm
Torque @ RPM - 4800 rpm
Turbocharger - Not Available
Compression Ratio - 12.5:1
Engine Position - Front Transverse

Final Verdict

🏆 Honda CR-V wins with 77 pts vs 56 pts for Starlet Cross

In structured scoring, CR-V emerges as the stronger overall package. However, Starlet Cross may appeal to buyers prioritising different factors. Ultimately, the right choice depends on your driving priorities in South Africa.

People Also Compare

Popular comparisons among buyers considering similar options.

Frequently Asked Questions

Based on structured category scoring, CR-V performs better overall in South Africa. However, final choice depends on driving priorities.

CR-V scores 16 while Starlet Cross scores 8 in efficiency. Real-world mileage may vary based on driving conditions.

In safety scoring, CR-V scores 18 and Starlet Cross scores 18. Both offer competitive safety packages in this segment.

CR-V scores 12 versus Starlet Cross scoring 12. Warranty coverage and ownership value influence this result.

Practicality scoring gives CR-V 14 and Starlet Cross 11, reflecting cabin space and usability.

Performance category shows CR-V scoring 17 compared to Starlet Cross scoring 7, indicating stronger overtaking capability.

While resale depends on market demand, ownership and brand positioning suggest CR-V may hold stronger long-term value.

Off-road suitability depends on drivetrain and ground clearance. Refer to the full specification comparison for detailed technical differences.

Efficiency and ownership categories influence running costs. CR-V performs slightly stronger overall in structured scoring.

Value depends on feature set, performance and ownership coverage. Structured comparison gives CR-V the overall advantage.

Detailed Comparison Analysis

The comparison between CR-V and Starlet Cross in South Africa evaluates performance, efficiency, safety, practicality and long-term ownership value.

Performance: CR-V scores 17 vs 7.

Efficiency: CR-V scores 16 vs 8.

Safety: CR-V scores 18 vs 18.

Practicality: CR-V scores 14 vs 11.

Ownership: CR-V scores 12 vs 12.

Final structured scoring gives CR-V the advantage in this comparison.