Honda CR-V vs Nissan Qashqai

In-depth comparison in South Africa covering price, performance, fuel efficiency, safety, practicality and long-term ownership costs.

Honda CR-V in South Africa

Honda CR-V

2.0 Hybrid e:HEV Hybrid Automatic
ZAR 819,900 ex-showroom
⚡ 204 kW (274 hp)
🔧 335 Nm
⛽ 20 km/l
VS
Nissan Qashqai in South Africa

Nissan Qashqai

1.3 Tekna CVT Petrol Automatic
ZAR 545,000 ex-showroom
⚡ 110 kW (148 hp)
🔧 270 Nm
⛽ 17 km/l
+

Add a 3rd car to compare

Quick Winners

Performance CR-V
Mileage CR-V
🔑 Ownership Tie

Overall Comparison Score

🏆 Winner
#1

CR-V

77
/ 100
+11
pts
#2

Qashqai

66
/ 100

Moderate difference between the models.

Executive Summary

CR-V has a slight advantage, but Qashqai remains highly competitive.

Key Differences At A Glance

Performance CR-V +7 pts
Efficiency CR-V +3 pts
Safety Equal
Practicality CR-V +1 pts
Ownership Equal

Category Score Breakdown

🏆 Overall Winner

CR-V

Performance 17/20
Efficiency 16/20
Safety 18/20
Practicality 14/20
Ownership 12/20

Qashqai

Performance 10/20
Efficiency 13/20
Safety 18/20
Practicality 13/20
Ownership 12/20

Pros & Cons

🏆 Overall Winner

CR-V

Pros
  • More powerful engine output
  • Better fuel efficiency
  • More practical for daily use
Cons
  • No major weaknesses identified
Best For: Highway Driving Fuel Efficiency Family Usage

Qashqai

Pros
  • No major strengths identified
Cons
  • Less powerful engine setup
  • Lower fuel efficiency
  • Less practical in daily usage
Best For: General Use

Who Should Buy Which?

CR-V

  • Drivers who prioritise strong highway performance and overtaking power
  • Buyers looking for better fuel efficiency
  • Large families needing more practicality and usability

Qashqai

  • Buyers looking for a balanced all-round vehicle

Full Specification Comparison

Specification CR-V Qashqai
Ground Clearance 200 180
Wheelbase 2700 2665
Length 4690 4425
Width 1860 1835
Height 1690 1625
Kerb Weight 1750 1450
Gross Vehicle Weight 2250 1980
Seating Capacity 5 5
Boot Space 497 504
Towing Capacity 1500 1800
Specification CR-V Qashqai
Engine 2.0L Hybrid Petrol 1.3L Turbocharged Petrol
Engine Type Inline 4 Cylinder Atkinson Cycle with Dual Electric Motors Inline 4 Turbo
Displacement 1993 1332
Cylinders 4 4
Valves per Cylinder 4 4
Power 204 110
Torque 335 270
Fuel System Direct Injection + Electric Motor Assist Direct Injection
Top Speed 195 200
0-100 km/h 8.5 8.9

Final Verdict

🏆 Honda CR-V wins with 77 pts vs 66 pts for Qashqai

In structured scoring, CR-V emerges as the stronger overall package. However, Qashqai may appeal to buyers prioritising different factors. Ultimately, the right choice depends on your driving priorities in South Africa.

People Also Compare

Popular comparisons among buyers considering similar options.

Frequently Asked Questions

Based on structured category scoring, CR-V performs better overall in South Africa. However, final choice depends on driving priorities.

CR-V scores 16 while Qashqai scores 13 in efficiency. Real-world mileage may vary based on driving conditions.

In safety scoring, CR-V scores 18 and Qashqai scores 18. Both offer competitive safety packages in this segment.

CR-V scores 12 versus Qashqai scoring 12. Warranty coverage and ownership value influence this result.

Practicality scoring gives CR-V 14 and Qashqai 13, reflecting cabin space and usability.

Performance category shows CR-V scoring 17 compared to Qashqai scoring 10, indicating stronger overtaking capability.

While resale depends on market demand, ownership and brand positioning suggest CR-V may hold stronger long-term value.

Off-road suitability depends on drivetrain and ground clearance. Refer to the full specification comparison for detailed technical differences.

Efficiency and ownership categories influence running costs. CR-V performs slightly stronger overall in structured scoring.

Value depends on feature set, performance and ownership coverage. Structured comparison gives CR-V the overall advantage.

Detailed Comparison Analysis

The comparison between CR-V and Qashqai in South Africa evaluates performance, efficiency, safety, practicality and long-term ownership value.

Performance: CR-V scores 17 vs 10.

Efficiency: CR-V scores 16 vs 13.

Safety: CR-V scores 18 vs 18.

Practicality: CR-V scores 14 vs 13.

Ownership: CR-V scores 12 vs 12.

Final structured scoring gives CR-V the advantage in this comparison.