Honda CR-V vs Ford Puma

In-depth comparison in South Africa covering price, performance, fuel efficiency, safety, practicality and long-term ownership costs.

Honda CR-V in South Africa

Honda CR-V

2.0 Hybrid e:HEV Hybrid Automatic
ZAR 819,900 ex-showroom
⚡ 204 kW (274 hp)
🔧 335 Nm
⛽ 20 km/l
VS
Ford Puma in South Africa

Ford Puma

1.0T EcoBoost ST-Line Automatic Petrol Automatic
ZAR 459,900 ex-showroom
⚡ 92 kW (123 hp)
🔧 170 Nm
⛽ 16.4 km/l
+

Add a 3rd car to compare

Quick Winners

Performance CR-V
Mileage CR-V
🔑 Ownership Tie

Overall Comparison Score

🏆 Winner
#1

CR-V

77
/ 100
+16
pts
#2

Puma

61
/ 100

Moderate difference between the models.

Executive Summary

CR-V holds a noticeable edge over Puma, especially in key ownership areas.

Key Differences At A Glance

Performance CR-V +9 pts
Efficiency CR-V +7 pts
Safety Puma +2 pts
Practicality CR-V +2 pts
Ownership Equal

Category Score Breakdown

🏆 Overall Winner

CR-V

Performance 17/20
Efficiency 16/20
Safety 18/20
Practicality 14/20
Ownership 12/20

Puma

Performance 8/20
Efficiency 9/20
Safety 20/20
Practicality 12/20
Ownership 12/20

Pros & Cons

🏆 Overall Winner

CR-V

Pros
  • More powerful engine output
  • Better fuel efficiency
  • More practical for daily use
Cons
  • Less comprehensive safety features
Best For: Highway Driving Fuel Efficiency Family Usage

Puma

Pros
  • Stronger safety package
Cons
  • Less powerful engine setup
  • Lower fuel efficiency
  • Less practical in daily usage
Best For: General Use

Who Should Buy Which?

CR-V

  • Drivers who prioritise strong highway performance and overtaking power
  • Buyers looking for better fuel efficiency
  • Large families needing more practicality and usability

Puma

  • Families prioritising stronger safety equipment

Full Specification Comparison

Specification CR-V Puma
Ground Clearance 200 170
Wheelbase 2700 2594
Length 4690 4186
Width 1860 1805
Height 1690 1531
Kerb Weight 1750 1325
Gross Vehicle Weight 2250 1775
Seating Capacity 5 5
Boot Space 497 456
Towing Capacity 1500 1200
Front Track Width - 1541
Rear Track Width - 1534
Turning Radius - 5.4
Specification CR-V Puma
Engine 2.0L Hybrid Petrol 1.0L EcoBoost Mild Hybrid
Engine Type Inline 4 Cylinder Atkinson Cycle with Dual Electric Motors Inline 3 Cylinder Turbo Mild Hybrid
Displacement 1993 999
Cylinders 4 3
Valves per Cylinder 4 4
Power 204 92
Torque 335 170
Fuel System Direct Injection + Electric Motor Assist Direct Injection
Top Speed 195 185
0-100 km/h 8.5 10.5
Power @ RPM - 6000 rpm
Torque @ RPM - 2000-4500 rpm
Turbocharger - Single Turbo
Compression Ratio - 10.5:1
Engine Position - Front Transverse

Final Verdict

🏆 Honda CR-V wins with 77 pts vs 61 pts for Puma

In structured scoring, CR-V emerges as the stronger overall package. However, Puma may appeal to buyers prioritising different factors. Ultimately, the right choice depends on your driving priorities in South Africa.

People Also Compare

Popular comparisons among buyers considering similar options.

Frequently Asked Questions

Based on structured category scoring, CR-V performs better overall in South Africa. However, final choice depends on driving priorities.

CR-V scores 16 while Puma scores 9 in efficiency. Real-world mileage may vary based on driving conditions.

In safety scoring, CR-V scores 18 and Puma scores 20. Both offer competitive safety packages in this segment.

CR-V scores 12 versus Puma scoring 12. Warranty coverage and ownership value influence this result.

Practicality scoring gives CR-V 14 and Puma 12, reflecting cabin space and usability.

Performance category shows CR-V scoring 17 compared to Puma scoring 8, indicating stronger overtaking capability.

While resale depends on market demand, ownership and brand positioning suggest CR-V may hold stronger long-term value.

Off-road suitability depends on drivetrain and ground clearance. Refer to the full specification comparison for detailed technical differences.

Efficiency and ownership categories influence running costs. CR-V performs slightly stronger overall in structured scoring.

Value depends on feature set, performance and ownership coverage. Structured comparison gives CR-V the overall advantage.

Detailed Comparison Analysis

The comparison between CR-V and Puma in South Africa evaluates performance, efficiency, safety, practicality and long-term ownership value.

Performance: CR-V scores 17 vs 8.

Efficiency: CR-V scores 16 vs 9.

Safety: CR-V scores 18 vs 20.

Practicality: CR-V scores 14 vs 12.

Ownership: CR-V scores 12 vs 12.

Final structured scoring gives CR-V the advantage in this comparison.