Honda CR-V vs Ford Mustang

In-depth comparison in South Africa covering price, performance, fuel efficiency, safety, practicality and long-term ownership costs.

Honda CR-V in South Africa

Honda CR-V

2.0 Hybrid e:HEV Hybrid Automatic
ZAR 819,900 ex-showroom
⚡ 204 kW (274 hp)
🔧 335 Nm
⛽ 20 km/l
VS
Ford Mustang in South Africa

Ford Mustang

5.0 GT Premium Convertible Automatic Petrol Automatic
ZAR 1,449,900 ex-showroom
⚡ 338 kW (453 hp)
🔧 515 Nm
⛽ 9.1 km/l
+

Add a 3rd car to compare

Quick Winners

Performance Mustang
Mileage CR-V
🔑 Ownership Tie

Overall Comparison Score

🏆 Winner
#1

CR-V

77
/ 100
+10
pts
#2

Mustang

67
/ 100

Moderate difference between the models.

Executive Summary

CR-V has a slight advantage, but Mustang remains highly competitive.

Key Differences At A Glance

Performance Mustang +3 pts
Efficiency CR-V +11 pts
Safety Mustang +2 pts
Practicality CR-V +4 pts
Ownership Equal

Category Score Breakdown

🏆 Overall Winner

CR-V

Performance 17/20
Efficiency 16/20
Safety 18/20
Practicality 14/20
Ownership 12/20

Mustang

Performance 20/20
Efficiency 5/20
Safety 20/20
Practicality 10/20
Ownership 12/20

Pros & Cons

🏆 Overall Winner

CR-V

Pros
  • Better fuel efficiency
  • More practical for daily use
Cons
  • Less powerful engine setup
  • Less comprehensive safety features
Best For: Fuel Efficiency Family Usage

Mustang

Pros
  • More powerful engine output
  • Stronger safety package
Cons
  • Lower fuel efficiency
  • Less practical in daily usage
Best For: Highway Driving

Who Should Buy Which?

CR-V

  • Buyers looking for better fuel efficiency
  • Large families needing more practicality and usability

Mustang

  • Drivers who prioritise strong highway performance and overtaking power
  • Families prioritising stronger safety equipment

Full Specification Comparison

Specification CR-V Mustang
Ground Clearance 200 134
Wheelbase 2700 2720
Length 4690 4788
Width 1860 1916
Height 1690 1381
Kerb Weight 1750 1815
Gross Vehicle Weight 2250 2245
Seating Capacity 5 4
Boot Space 497 408
Towing Capacity 1500 Not Rated
Front Track Width - 1617
Rear Track Width - 1607
Turning Radius - 6.1
Specification CR-V Mustang
Engine 2.0L Hybrid Petrol 5.0L Coyote V8 Petrol
Engine Type Inline 4 Cylinder Atkinson Cycle with Dual Electric Motors V8 DOHC Naturally Aspirated
Displacement 1993 4951
Cylinders 4 8
Valves per Cylinder 4 4
Power 204 338
Torque 335 515
Fuel System Direct Injection + Electric Motor Assist Direct Injection
Top Speed 195 250
0-100 km/h 8.5 4.6
Power @ RPM - 7300 rpm
Torque @ RPM - 4250 rpm
Turbocharger - Not Available
Compression Ratio - 12.0:1
Engine Position - Front Longitudinal

Final Verdict

🏆 Honda CR-V wins with 77 pts vs 67 pts for Mustang

In structured scoring, CR-V emerges as the stronger overall package. However, Mustang may appeal to buyers prioritising different factors. Ultimately, the right choice depends on your driving priorities in South Africa.

People Also Compare

Popular comparisons among buyers considering similar options.

Frequently Asked Questions

Based on structured category scoring, CR-V performs better overall in South Africa. However, final choice depends on driving priorities.

CR-V scores 16 while Mustang scores 5 in efficiency. Real-world mileage may vary based on driving conditions.

In safety scoring, CR-V scores 18 and Mustang scores 20. Both offer competitive safety packages in this segment.

CR-V scores 12 versus Mustang scoring 12. Warranty coverage and ownership value influence this result.

Practicality scoring gives CR-V 14 and Mustang 10, reflecting cabin space and usability.

Performance category shows CR-V scoring 17 compared to Mustang scoring 20, indicating stronger overtaking capability.

While resale depends on market demand, ownership and brand positioning suggest CR-V may hold stronger long-term value.

Off-road suitability depends on drivetrain and ground clearance. Refer to the full specification comparison for detailed technical differences.

Efficiency and ownership categories influence running costs. CR-V performs slightly stronger overall in structured scoring.

Value depends on feature set, performance and ownership coverage. Structured comparison gives CR-V the overall advantage.

Detailed Comparison Analysis

The comparison between CR-V and Mustang in South Africa evaluates performance, efficiency, safety, practicality and long-term ownership value.

Performance: CR-V scores 17 vs 20.

Efficiency: CR-V scores 16 vs 5.

Safety: CR-V scores 18 vs 20.

Practicality: CR-V scores 14 vs 10.

Ownership: CR-V scores 12 vs 12.

Final structured scoring gives CR-V the advantage in this comparison.