Honda CR-V vs Toyota Land Cruiser 76

In-depth comparison in South Africa covering price, performance, fuel efficiency, safety, practicality and long-term ownership costs.

Honda CR-V in South Africa

Honda CR-V

2.0 Hybrid e:HEV Hybrid Automatic
ZAR 819,900 ex-showroom
⚡ 204 kW (274 hp)
🔧 335 Nm
⛽ 20 km/l
VS
Toyota Land Cruiser 76 in South Africa

Toyota Land Cruiser 76

4.0 V6 Station Wagon AT Petrol Automatic
ZAR 1,065,300 ex-showroom
⚡ 202 kW (271 hp)
🔧 381 Nm
⛽ 10.5 km/l
+

Add a 3rd car to compare

Quick Winners

Performance Land Cruiser 76
Mileage CR-V
🔑 Ownership Tie

Overall Comparison Score

🏆 Winner
#1

CR-V

77
/ 100
+10
pts
#2

Land Cruiser 76

67
/ 100

Moderate difference between the models.

Executive Summary

CR-V has a slight advantage, but Land Cruiser 76 remains highly competitive.

Key Differences At A Glance

Performance Land Cruiser 76 +1 pts
Efficiency CR-V +9 pts
Safety Land Cruiser 76 +2 pts
Practicality CR-V +4 pts
Ownership Equal

Category Score Breakdown

🏆 Overall Winner

CR-V

Performance 17/20
Efficiency 16/20
Safety 18/20
Practicality 14/20
Ownership 12/20

Land Cruiser 76

Performance 18/20
Efficiency 7/20
Safety 20/20
Practicality 10/20
Ownership 12/20

Pros & Cons

🏆 Overall Winner

CR-V

Pros
  • Better fuel efficiency
  • More practical for daily use
Cons
  • Less powerful engine setup
  • Less comprehensive safety features
Best For: Fuel Efficiency Family Usage

Land Cruiser 76

Pros
  • More powerful engine output
  • Stronger safety package
Cons
  • Lower fuel efficiency
  • Less practical in daily usage
Best For: Highway Driving

Who Should Buy Which?

CR-V

  • Buyers looking for better fuel efficiency
  • Large families needing more practicality and usability

Land Cruiser 76

  • Drivers who prioritise strong highway performance and overtaking power
  • Families prioritising stronger safety equipment

Full Specification Comparison

Specification CR-V Land Cruiser 76
Ground Clearance 200 230
Wheelbase 2700 2850
Length 4690 4890
Width 1860 1885
Height 1690 1900
Kerb Weight 1750 2180
Gross Vehicle Weight 2250 3000
Seating Capacity 5 8
Boot Space 497 120
Towing Capacity 1500 3000
Specification CR-V Land Cruiser 76
Engine 2.0L Hybrid Petrol 4.0L V6 Naturally Aspirated Petrol
Engine Type Inline 4 Cylinder Atkinson Cycle with Dual Electric Motors V6 1GR-FE
Displacement 1993 3956
Cylinders 4 6
Valves per Cylinder 4 4
Power 204 202
Torque 335 381
Fuel System Direct Injection + Electric Motor Assist Common Rail Direct Injection
Top Speed 195 175
0-100 km/h 8.5 10.5
Power @ RPM - 5600 rpm
Torque @ RPM - 4400 rpm
Turbocharger - Not Available

Final Verdict

🏆 Honda CR-V wins with 77 pts vs 67 pts for Land Cruiser 76

In structured scoring, CR-V emerges as the stronger overall package. However, Land Cruiser 76 may appeal to buyers prioritising different factors. Ultimately, the right choice depends on your driving priorities in South Africa.

People Also Compare

Popular comparisons among buyers considering similar options.

Frequently Asked Questions

Based on structured category scoring, CR-V performs better overall in South Africa. However, final choice depends on driving priorities.

CR-V scores 16 while Land Cruiser 76 scores 7 in efficiency. Real-world mileage may vary based on driving conditions.

In safety scoring, CR-V scores 18 and Land Cruiser 76 scores 20. Both offer competitive safety packages in this segment.

CR-V scores 12 versus Land Cruiser 76 scoring 12. Warranty coverage and ownership value influence this result.

Practicality scoring gives CR-V 14 and Land Cruiser 76 10, reflecting cabin space and usability.

Performance category shows CR-V scoring 17 compared to Land Cruiser 76 scoring 18, indicating stronger overtaking capability.

While resale depends on market demand, ownership and brand positioning suggest CR-V may hold stronger long-term value.

Off-road suitability depends on drivetrain and ground clearance. Refer to the full specification comparison for detailed technical differences.

Efficiency and ownership categories influence running costs. CR-V performs slightly stronger overall in structured scoring.

Value depends on feature set, performance and ownership coverage. Structured comparison gives CR-V the overall advantage.

Detailed Comparison Analysis

The comparison between CR-V and Land Cruiser 76 in South Africa evaluates performance, efficiency, safety, practicality and long-term ownership value.

Performance: CR-V scores 17 vs 18.

Efficiency: CR-V scores 16 vs 7.

Safety: CR-V scores 18 vs 20.

Practicality: CR-V scores 14 vs 10.

Ownership: CR-V scores 12 vs 12.

Final structured scoring gives CR-V the advantage in this comparison.