Honda CR-V vs Toyota Land Cruiser 300

In-depth comparison in South Africa covering price, performance, fuel efficiency, safety, practicality and long-term ownership costs.

Honda CR-V in South Africa

Honda CR-V

2.0 Hybrid e:HEV Hybrid Automatic
ZAR 819,900 ex-showroom
⚡ 204 kW (274 hp)
🔧 335 Nm
⛽ 20 km/l
VS
Toyota Land Cruiser 300 in South Africa

Toyota Land Cruiser 300

3.3D VX-R 4x4 Automatic Diesel Automatic
ZAR 2,149,900 ex-showroom
⚡ 227 kW (304 hp)
🔧 700 Nm
⛽ 9.4 km/l
+
＋

Add a 3rd car to compare

Quick Winners

⚡ Performance Land Cruiser 300
⛽ Mileage CR-V
🔑 Ownership Tie

Overall Comparison Score

🏆 Winner
#1

CR-V

77
/ 100
+7
pts
#2

Land Cruiser 300

70
/ 100

Very close match. Final decision depends on buyer preference.

Executive Summary

Both CR-V and Land Cruiser 300 are extremely closely matched, making the final choice dependent on buyer preference.

Key Differences At A Glance

Performance Land Cruiser 300 +3 pts
Efficiency CR-V +11 pts
Safety Land Cruiser 300 +2 pts
Practicality CR-V +1 pts
Ownership Equal

Category Score Breakdown

🏆 Overall Winner

CR-V

Performance 17/20
Efficiency 16/20
Safety 18/20
Practicality 14/20
Ownership 12/20

Land Cruiser 300

Performance 20/20
Efficiency 5/20
Safety 20/20
Practicality 13/20
Ownership 12/20

Pros & Cons

🏆 Overall Winner

CR-V

Pros
  • Better fuel efficiency
  • More practical for daily use
Cons
  • Less powerful engine setup
  • Less comprehensive safety features
Best For: Fuel Efficiency Family Usage

Land Cruiser 300

Pros
  • More powerful engine output
  • Stronger safety package
Cons
  • Lower fuel efficiency
  • Less practical in daily usage
Best For: Highway Driving

Who Should Buy Which?

CR-V

  • Buyers looking for better fuel efficiency
  • Large families needing more practicality and usability

Land Cruiser 300

  • Drivers who prioritise strong highway performance and overtaking power
  • Families prioritising stronger safety equipment

Full Specification Comparison

Specification CR-V Land Cruiser 300
Ground Clearance 200 235
Wheelbase 2700 2850
Length 4690 4985
Width 1860 1980
Height 1690 1910
Kerb Weight 1750 2430
Gross Vehicle Weight 2250 3300
Seating Capacity 5 7
Boot Space 497 309
Towing Capacity 1500 3500
Front Track Width - 1675
Rear Track Width - 1675
Turning Radius - 6.0
Specification CR-V Land Cruiser 300
Engine 2.0L Hybrid Petrol 3.3L Twin-Turbo V6 Diesel
Engine Type Inline 4 Cylinder Atkinson Cycle with Dual Electric Motors V6 Twin-Turbocharged DOHC
Displacement 1993 3346
Cylinders 4 6
Valves per Cylinder 4 4
Power 204 227
Torque 335 700
Fuel System Direct Injection + Electric Motor Assist Common Rail Direct Injection
Top Speed 195 210
0-100 km/h 8.5 7.5
Power @ RPM - 3000-3600 rpm
Torque @ RPM - 1600-2600 rpm
Turbocharger - Twin Turbo
Compression Ratio - 15.4:1
Engine Position - Front Longitudinal

Final Verdict

🏆 Honda CR-V wins with 77 pts vs 70 pts for Land Cruiser 300

In structured scoring, CR-V emerges as the stronger overall package. However, Land Cruiser 300 may appeal to buyers prioritising different factors. Ultimately, the right choice depends on your driving priorities in South Africa.

Related Comparisons

See how similar cars stack up against each other.

CR-V
CR-V
VS
EcoSport
EcoSport
CR-V vs EcoSport →
CR-V
CR-V
VS
Everest
Everest
CR-V vs Everest →
CR-V
CR-V
VS
Mustang
Mustang
CR-V vs Mustang →
CR-V
CR-V
VS
Puma
Puma
CR-V vs Puma →
CR-V
CR-V
VS
Ranger
Ranger
CR-V vs Ranger →
CR-V
CR-V
VS
Territory
Territory
CR-V vs Territory →
Land Cruiser 300
Land Cruiser 300
VS
EcoSport
EcoSport
Land Cruiser 300 vs EcoSport →
Land Cruiser 300
Land Cruiser 300
VS
Everest
Everest
Land Cruiser 300 vs Everest →

People Also Compare

Popular comparisons among buyers considering similar options.

CR-V
CR-V
VS
EcoSport
EcoSport
CR-V vs EcoSport →
CR-V
CR-V
VS
Everest
Everest
CR-V vs Everest →
CR-V
CR-V
VS
Puma
Puma
CR-V vs Puma →
CR-V
CR-V
VS
Territory
Territory
CR-V vs Territory →
CR-V
CR-V
VS
Elevate
Elevate
CR-V vs Elevate →
CR-V
CR-V
VS
HR-V
HR-V
CR-V vs HR-V →

Frequently Asked Questions

Based on structured category scoring, CR-V performs better overall in South Africa. However, final choice depends on driving priorities.

CR-V scores 16 while Land Cruiser 300 scores 5 in efficiency. Real-world mileage may vary based on driving conditions.

In safety scoring, CR-V scores 18 and Land Cruiser 300 scores 20. Both offer competitive safety packages in this segment.

CR-V scores 12 versus Land Cruiser 300 scoring 12. Warranty coverage and ownership value influence this result.

Practicality scoring gives CR-V 14 and Land Cruiser 300 13, reflecting cabin space and usability.

Performance category shows CR-V scoring 17 compared to Land Cruiser 300 scoring 20, indicating stronger overtaking capability.

While resale depends on market demand, ownership and brand positioning suggest CR-V may hold stronger long-term value.

Off-road suitability depends on drivetrain and ground clearance. Refer to the full specification comparison for detailed technical differences.

Efficiency and ownership categories influence running costs. CR-V performs slightly stronger overall in structured scoring.

Value depends on feature set, performance and ownership coverage. Structured comparison gives CR-V the overall advantage.

Detailed Comparison Analysis

The comparison between CR-V and Land Cruiser 300 in South Africa evaluates performance, efficiency, safety, practicality and long-term ownership value.

Performance: CR-V scores 17 vs 20.

Efficiency: CR-V scores 16 vs 5.

Safety: CR-V scores 18 vs 20.

Practicality: CR-V scores 14 vs 13.

Ownership: CR-V scores 12 vs 12.

Final structured scoring gives CR-V the advantage in this comparison.