Honda CR-V vs Ford EcoSport

In-depth comparison in South Africa covering price, performance, fuel efficiency, safety, practicality and long-term ownership costs.

Honda CR-V in South Africa

Honda CR-V

ZAR 689,900 – 819,900
⚡ 190 hp
🔧 240 Nm
⛽ 14.5 km/l
VS
Ford EcoSport in South Africa

Ford EcoSport

ZAR 310,000 – 395,000
⚡ 92 hp
🔧 170 Nm
⛽ 17.2 km/l

Quick Winners

Performance CR-V
Mileage EcoSport
🔑 Ownership EcoSport

Overall Comparison Score

🏆 Winner

CR-V

67
out of 100
4
point lead
Very close match. Final decision depends on buyer preference.

EcoSport

63
out of 100

Executive Summary

Both CR-V and EcoSport are extremely closely matched, making the final choice dependent on buyer preference.

Key Differences At A Glance

Performance CR-V +7 pts
Efficiency EcoSport +1 pts
Safety Equal
Practicality CR-V +2 pts
Ownership EcoSport +4 pts

Category Score Breakdown

🏆 Overall Winner

CR-V

Performance 15/20
Efficiency 8/20
Safety 18/20
Practicality 14/20
Ownership 12/20

EcoSport

Performance 8/20
Efficiency 9/20
Safety 18/20
Practicality 12/20
Ownership 16/20

Pros & Cons

🏆 Overall Winner

CR-V

Pros
  • More powerful engine output
  • More practical for daily use
Cons
  • Lower fuel efficiency
  • Shorter warranty coverage
Best For: Highway Driving Family Usage

EcoSport

Pros
  • Better fuel efficiency
  • Better long-term ownership value
Cons
  • Less powerful engine setup
  • Less practical in daily usage
Best For: Fuel Efficiency

Who Should Buy Which?

CR-V

  • Drivers who prioritise strong highway performance and overtaking power
  • Large families needing more practicality and usability

EcoSport

  • Buyers looking for better fuel efficiency
  • Long-term owners valuing warranty and ownership peace of mind

Full Specification Comparison

Specification CR-V EcoSport
Ground Clearance 198 200
Wheelbase 2700 2519
Length 4690 4325
Width 1860 1765
Height 1690 1653
Kerb Weight 1580 1290
Gross Vehicle Weight 2100 1740
Seating Capacity 5 5
Boot Space 522 352
Towing Capacity 1500 950
Specification CR-V EcoSport
Engine 1.5L Turbo Petrol 1.0L EcoBoost Turbo Petrol
Engine Type Inline 4 Cylinder Turbocharged Inline 3 Turbocharged
Displacement 1498 998
Cylinders 4 3
Valves per Cylinder 4 4
Power 190 92
Torque 240 170
Fuel System Direct Injection Direct Injection
Top Speed 200 185
0-100 km/h 9.5 10.5

Final Verdict

🏆 Honda CR-V wins this comparison with 67 points vs 63 points for EcoSport.

In structured scoring, CR-V emerges as the stronger overall package. However, EcoSport may appeal to buyers prioritising different factors. Ultimately, the right choice depends on your driving priorities in South Africa.

People Also Compare

Popular comparisons among buyers considering similar options.

Frequently Asked Questions

Based on structured category scoring, CR-V performs better overall in South Africa. However, final choice depends on driving priorities.

CR-V scores 8 while EcoSport scores 9 in efficiency. Real-world mileage may vary based on driving conditions.

In safety scoring, CR-V scores 18 and EcoSport scores 18. Both offer competitive safety packages in this segment.

CR-V scores 12 versus EcoSport scoring 16. Warranty coverage and ownership value influence this result.

Practicality scoring gives CR-V 14 and EcoSport 12, reflecting cabin space and usability.

Performance category shows CR-V scoring 15 compared to EcoSport scoring 8, indicating stronger overtaking capability.

While resale depends on market demand, ownership and brand positioning suggest CR-V may hold stronger long-term value.

Off-road suitability depends on drivetrain and ground clearance. Refer to the full specification comparison for detailed technical differences.

Efficiency and ownership categories influence running costs. CR-V performs slightly stronger overall in structured scoring.

Value depends on feature set, performance and ownership coverage. Structured comparison gives CR-V the overall advantage.

Detailed Comparison Analysis

The comparison between CR-V and EcoSport in South Africa evaluates performance, efficiency, safety, practicality and long-term ownership value.

Performance: CR-V scores 15 vs 8.

Efficiency: CR-V scores 8 vs 9.

Safety: CR-V scores 18 vs 18.

Practicality: CR-V scores 14 vs 12.

Ownership: CR-V scores 12 vs 16.

Final structured scoring gives CR-V the advantage in this comparison.