Honda Civic Type R vs Ford Puma

In-depth comparison in South Africa covering price, performance, fuel efficiency, safety, practicality and long-term ownership costs.

Honda Civic Type R in South Africa

Honda Civic Type R

2.0T Type R Manual Petrol Manual
ZAR 1,021,600 ex-showroom
⚡ 315 kW (422 hp)
🔧 420 Nm
⛽ 12 km/l
VS
Ford Puma in South Africa

Ford Puma

1.0T EcoBoost ST-Line Automatic Petrol Automatic
ZAR 459,900 ex-showroom
⚡ 92 kW (123 hp)
🔧 170 Nm
⛽ 16.4 km/l
+

Add a 3rd car to compare

Quick Winners

Performance Civic Type R
Mileage Tie
🔑 Ownership Tie

Overall Comparison Score

🏆 Winner
#1

Civic Type R

69
/ 100
+8
pts
#2

Puma

61
/ 100

Very close match. Final decision depends on buyer preference.

Executive Summary

Civic Type R has a slight advantage, but Puma remains highly competitive.

Key Differences At A Glance

Performance Civic Type R +12 pts
Efficiency Equal
Safety Puma +2 pts
Practicality Puma +2 pts
Ownership Equal

Category Score Breakdown

🏆 Overall Winner

Civic Type R

Performance 20/20
Efficiency 9/20
Safety 18/20
Practicality 10/20
Ownership 12/20

Puma

Performance 8/20
Efficiency 9/20
Safety 20/20
Practicality 12/20
Ownership 12/20

Pros & Cons

🏆 Overall Winner

Civic Type R

Pros
  • More powerful engine output
Cons
  • Less comprehensive safety features
  • Less practical in daily usage
Best For: Highway Driving

Puma

Pros
  • Stronger safety package
  • More practical for daily use
Cons
  • Less powerful engine setup
Best For: Family Usage

Who Should Buy Which?

Civic Type R

  • Drivers who prioritise strong highway performance and overtaking power

Puma

  • Families prioritising stronger safety equipment
  • Large families needing more practicality and usability

Full Specification Comparison

Specification Civic Type R Puma
Ground Clearance 130 170
Wheelbase 2735 2594
Length 4595 4186
Width 1890 1805
Height 1405 1531
Kerb Weight 1430 1325
Gross Vehicle Weight 1850 1775
Seating Capacity 4 5
Boot Space 410 456
Towing Capacity 0 1200
Turning Radius 5.7 5.4
Front Track Width - 1541
Rear Track Width - 1534
Specification Civic Type R Puma
Engine 2.0L Turbo Petrol 1.0L EcoBoost Mild Hybrid
Engine Type Inline 4 Cylinder Turbocharged VTEC Inline 3 Cylinder Turbo Mild Hybrid
Displacement 1996 999
Cylinders 4 3
Compression Ratio 9.8:1 10.5:1
Power 315 92
Torque 420 170
Fuel System Direct Injection Direct Injection
Turbocharger High-Performance Single Turbo Single Turbo
Top Speed 272 185
0-100 km/h 5.4 10.5
Valves per Cylinder - 4
Power @ RPM - 6000 rpm
Torque @ RPM - 2000-4500 rpm
Engine Position - Front Transverse

Final Verdict

🏆 Honda Civic Type R wins with 69 pts vs 61 pts for Puma

In structured scoring, Civic Type R emerges as the stronger overall package. However, Puma may appeal to buyers prioritising different factors. Ultimately, the right choice depends on your driving priorities in South Africa.

People Also Compare

Popular comparisons among buyers considering similar options.

Frequently Asked Questions

Based on structured category scoring, Civic Type R performs better overall in South Africa. However, final choice depends on driving priorities.

Civic Type R scores 9 while Puma scores 9 in efficiency. Real-world mileage may vary based on driving conditions.

In safety scoring, Civic Type R scores 18 and Puma scores 20. Both offer competitive safety packages in this segment.

Civic Type R scores 12 versus Puma scoring 12. Warranty coverage and ownership value influence this result.

Practicality scoring gives Civic Type R 10 and Puma 12, reflecting cabin space and usability.

Performance category shows Civic Type R scoring 20 compared to Puma scoring 8, indicating stronger overtaking capability.

While resale depends on market demand, ownership and brand positioning suggest Civic Type R may hold stronger long-term value.

Off-road suitability depends on drivetrain and ground clearance. Refer to the full specification comparison for detailed technical differences.

Efficiency and ownership categories influence running costs. Civic Type R performs slightly stronger overall in structured scoring.

Value depends on feature set, performance and ownership coverage. Structured comparison gives Civic Type R the overall advantage.

Detailed Comparison Analysis

The comparison between Civic Type R and Puma in South Africa evaluates performance, efficiency, safety, practicality and long-term ownership value.

Performance: Civic Type R scores 20 vs 8.

Efficiency: Civic Type R scores 9 vs 9.

Safety: Civic Type R scores 18 vs 20.

Practicality: Civic Type R scores 10 vs 12.

Ownership: Civic Type R scores 12 vs 12.

Final structured scoring gives Civic Type R the advantage in this comparison.