Honda Civic RS vs Ford Puma

In-depth comparison in South Africa covering price, performance, fuel efficiency, safety, practicality and long-term ownership costs.

Honda Civic RS in South Africa

Honda Civic RS

1.5T RS CVT Petrol Automatic
ZAR 725,000 ex-showroom
⚡ 178 kW (239 hp)
🔧 240 Nm
⛽ 16 km/l
VS
Ford Puma in South Africa

Ford Puma

1.0T EcoBoost ST-Line Automatic Petrol Automatic
ZAR 459,900 ex-showroom
⚡ 92 kW (123 hp)
🔧 170 Nm
⛽ 16.4 km/l
+

Add a 3rd car to compare

Quick Winners

Performance Civic RS
Mileage Civic RS
🔑 Ownership Tie

Overall Comparison Score

🏆 Winner
#1

Civic RS

67
/ 100
+6
pts
#2

Puma

61
/ 100

Very close match. Final decision depends on buyer preference.

Executive Summary

Both Civic RS and Puma are extremely closely matched, making the final choice dependent on buyer preference.

Key Differences At A Glance

Performance Civic RS +6 pts
Efficiency Civic RS +3 pts
Safety Puma +2 pts
Practicality Puma +1 pts
Ownership Equal

Category Score Breakdown

🏆 Overall Winner

Civic RS

Performance 14/20
Efficiency 12/20
Safety 18/20
Practicality 11/20
Ownership 12/20

Puma

Performance 8/20
Efficiency 9/20
Safety 20/20
Practicality 12/20
Ownership 12/20

Pros & Cons

🏆 Overall Winner

Civic RS

Pros
  • More powerful engine output
  • Better fuel efficiency
Cons
  • Less comprehensive safety features
  • Less practical in daily usage
Best For: Highway Driving Fuel Efficiency

Puma

Pros
  • Stronger safety package
  • More practical for daily use
Cons
  • Less powerful engine setup
  • Lower fuel efficiency
Best For: Family Usage

Who Should Buy Which?

Civic RS

  • Drivers who prioritise strong highway performance and overtaking power
  • Buyers looking for better fuel efficiency

Puma

  • Families prioritising stronger safety equipment
  • Large families needing more practicality and usability

Full Specification Comparison

Specification Civic RS Puma
Ground Clearance 134 170
Wheelbase 2735 2594
Length 4678 4186
Width 1802 1805
Height 1415 1531
Kerb Weight 1350 1325
Gross Vehicle Weight 1800 1775
Seating Capacity 5 5
Boot Space 495 456
Towing Capacity 1200 1200
Turning Radius 5.5 5.4
Front Track Width - 1541
Rear Track Width - 1534
Specification Civic RS Puma
Engine 1.5L Turbo Petrol 1.0L EcoBoost Mild Hybrid
Engine Type Inline 4 Cylinder Turbocharged Inline 3 Cylinder Turbo Mild Hybrid
Displacement 1498 999
Cylinders 4 3
Compression Ratio 10.3:1 10.5:1
Power 178 92
Torque 240 170
Fuel System Direct Injection Direct Injection
Turbocharger Single Turbo Single Turbo
Top Speed 210 185
0-100 km/h 8.5 10.5
Valves per Cylinder - 4
Power @ RPM - 6000 rpm
Torque @ RPM - 2000-4500 rpm
Engine Position - Front Transverse

Final Verdict

🏆 Honda Civic RS wins with 67 pts vs 61 pts for Puma

In structured scoring, Civic RS emerges as the stronger overall package. However, Puma may appeal to buyers prioritising different factors. Ultimately, the right choice depends on your driving priorities in South Africa.

People Also Compare

Popular comparisons among buyers considering similar options.

Frequently Asked Questions

Based on structured category scoring, Civic RS performs better overall in South Africa. However, final choice depends on driving priorities.

Civic RS scores 12 while Puma scores 9 in efficiency. Real-world mileage may vary based on driving conditions.

In safety scoring, Civic RS scores 18 and Puma scores 20. Both offer competitive safety packages in this segment.

Civic RS scores 12 versus Puma scoring 12. Warranty coverage and ownership value influence this result.

Practicality scoring gives Civic RS 11 and Puma 12, reflecting cabin space and usability.

Performance category shows Civic RS scoring 14 compared to Puma scoring 8, indicating stronger overtaking capability.

While resale depends on market demand, ownership and brand positioning suggest Civic RS may hold stronger long-term value.

Off-road suitability depends on drivetrain and ground clearance. Refer to the full specification comparison for detailed technical differences.

Efficiency and ownership categories influence running costs. Civic RS performs slightly stronger overall in structured scoring.

Value depends on feature set, performance and ownership coverage. Structured comparison gives Civic RS the overall advantage.

Detailed Comparison Analysis

The comparison between Civic RS and Puma in South Africa evaluates performance, efficiency, safety, practicality and long-term ownership value.

Performance: Civic RS scores 14 vs 8.

Efficiency: Civic RS scores 12 vs 9.

Safety: Civic RS scores 18 vs 20.

Practicality: Civic RS scores 11 vs 12.

Ownership: Civic RS scores 12 vs 12.

Final structured scoring gives Civic RS the advantage in this comparison.