Toyota Camry vs Ford Everest

In-depth comparison in South Africa covering price, performance, fuel efficiency, safety, practicality and long-term ownership costs.

Toyota Camry in South Africa

Toyota Camry

2.5 Hybrid XSE CVT Hybrid Automatic
ZAR 749,900 ex-showroom
⚡ 160 kW (215 hp)
🔧 221 Nm
⛽ 19.2 km/l
VS
Ford Everest in South Africa

Ford Everest

3.0TD V6 Platinum 10AT 4WD Diesel Automatic
ZAR 1,099,900 ex-showroom
⚡ 125 kW (168 hp)
🔧 405 Nm
⛽ 14.0 km/l
+

Add a 3rd car to compare

Quick Winners

Performance Tie
Mileage Camry
🔑 Ownership Everest

Overall Comparison Score

🏆 Winner
#1

Camry

69
/ 100
+1
pts
#2

Everest

68
/ 100

Very close match. Final decision depends on buyer preference.

Executive Summary

Both Camry and Everest are extremely closely matched, making the final choice dependent on buyer preference.

Key Differences At A Glance

Performance Equal
Efficiency Camry +5 pts
Safety Equal
Practicality Equal
Ownership Everest +4 pts

Category Score Breakdown

🏆 Overall Winner

Camry

Performance 13/20
Efficiency 12/20
Safety 20/20
Practicality 12/20
Ownership 12/20

Everest

Performance 13/20
Efficiency 7/20
Safety 20/20
Practicality 12/20
Ownership 16/20

Pros & Cons

🏆 Overall Winner

Camry

Pros
  • Better fuel efficiency
Cons
  • Shorter warranty coverage
Best For: Fuel Efficiency

Everest

Pros
  • Better long-term ownership value
Cons
  • Lower fuel efficiency
Best For: General Use

Who Should Buy Which?

Camry

  • Buyers looking for better fuel efficiency

Everest

  • Long-term owners valuing warranty and ownership peace of mind

Full Specification Comparison

Specification Camry Everest
Ground Clearance 140 220
Wheelbase 2825 2900
Length 4885 4914
Width 1840 1923
Height 1445 1842
Kerb Weight 1575 2305
Gross Vehicle Weight 2055 3100
Seating Capacity 5 7
Boot Space 493 259
Towing Capacity Not Rated 3500
Front Track Width 1575 -
Rear Track Width 1580 -
Turning Radius 5.8 -
Specification Camry Everest
Engine 2.5L Hybrid Petrol-Electric 2.0L Single Turbo Diesel
Engine Type Inline 4 Cylinder DOHC Hybrid Inline 4 Turbocharged
Displacement 2487 1996
Cylinders 4 4
Valves per Cylinder 4 4
Power 160 125
Power @ RPM 5700 rpm -
Torque 221 405
Torque @ RPM 3600 rpm -
Fuel System Direct + Port Injection Common Rail Direct Injection
Turbocharger Not Applicable -
Top Speed 180 180
0-100 km/h 8.3 11.5
Compression Ratio 14.0:1 -
Engine Position Front Transverse -

Final Verdict

🏆 Toyota Camry wins with 69 pts vs 68 pts for Everest

In structured scoring, Camry emerges as the stronger overall package. However, Everest may appeal to buyers prioritising different factors. Ultimately, the right choice depends on your driving priorities in South Africa.

People Also Compare

Popular comparisons among buyers considering similar options.

Frequently Asked Questions

Based on structured category scoring, Camry performs better overall in South Africa. However, final choice depends on driving priorities.

Camry scores 12 while Everest scores 7 in efficiency. Real-world mileage may vary based on driving conditions.

In safety scoring, Camry scores 20 and Everest scores 20. Both offer competitive safety packages in this segment.

Camry scores 12 versus Everest scoring 16. Warranty coverage and ownership value influence this result.

Practicality scoring gives Camry 12 and Everest 12, reflecting cabin space and usability.

Performance category shows Camry scoring 13 compared to Everest scoring 13, indicating stronger overtaking capability.

While resale depends on market demand, ownership and brand positioning suggest Camry may hold stronger long-term value.

Off-road suitability depends on drivetrain and ground clearance. Refer to the full specification comparison for detailed technical differences.

Efficiency and ownership categories influence running costs. Camry performs slightly stronger overall in structured scoring.

Value depends on feature set, performance and ownership coverage. Structured comparison gives Camry the overall advantage.

Detailed Comparison Analysis

The comparison between Camry and Everest in South Africa evaluates performance, efficiency, safety, practicality and long-term ownership value.

Performance: Camry scores 13 vs 13.

Efficiency: Camry scores 12 vs 7.

Safety: Camry scores 20 vs 20.

Practicality: Camry scores 12 vs 12.

Ownership: Camry scores 12 vs 16.

Final structured scoring gives Camry the advantage in this comparison.