Toyota C-HR vs Ford Territory

In-depth comparison in South Africa covering price, performance, fuel efficiency, safety, practicality and long-term ownership costs.

Toyota C-HR in South Africa

Toyota C-HR

2.0 HEV GR Sport CVT Hybrid Automatic
ZAR 499,000 ex-showroom
⚡ 135 kW (181 hp)
🔧 185 Nm
⛽ 18.0 km/l
VS
Ford Territory in South Africa

Ford Territory

1.8T Dark Edition DCT Petrol Automatic
ZAR 733,000 ex-showroom
⚡ 140 kW (188 hp)
🔧 320 Nm
⛽ 13.5 km/l
+

Add a 3rd car to compare

Quick Winners

Performance Territory
Mileage C-HR
🔑 Ownership Territory

Overall Comparison Score

🏆 Winner
#1

Territory

68
/ 100
+1
pts
#2

C-HR

67
/ 100

Very close match. Final decision depends on buyer preference.

Executive Summary

Both C-HR and Territory are extremely closely matched, making the final choice dependent on buyer preference.

Key Differences At A Glance

Performance Territory +2 pts
Efficiency C-HR +4 pts
Safety C-HR +2 pts
Practicality Territory +1 pts
Ownership Territory +4 pts

Category Score Breakdown

🏆 Overall Winner

Territory

Performance 13/20
Efficiency 8/20
Safety 18/20
Practicality 13/20
Ownership 16/20

C-HR

Performance 11/20
Efficiency 12/20
Safety 20/20
Practicality 12/20
Ownership 12/20

Pros & Cons

C-HR

Pros
  • Better fuel efficiency
  • Stronger safety package
Cons
  • Less powerful engine setup
  • Less practical in daily usage
  • Shorter warranty coverage
Best For: Fuel Efficiency
🏆 Overall Winner

Territory

Pros
  • More powerful engine output
  • More practical for daily use
  • Better long-term ownership value
Cons
  • Lower fuel efficiency
  • Less comprehensive safety features
Best For: Highway Driving Family Usage

Who Should Buy Which?

C-HR

  • Buyers looking for better fuel efficiency
  • Families prioritising stronger safety equipment

Territory

  • Drivers who prioritise strong highway performance and overtaking power
  • Large families needing more practicality and usability
  • Long-term owners valuing warranty and ownership peace of mind

Full Specification Comparison

Specification C-HR Territory
Ground Clearance 165 190
Wheelbase 2640 2716
Length 4390 4630
Width 1820 1935
Height 1565 1706
Kerb Weight 1545 1635
Gross Vehicle Weight 1945 2150
Seating Capacity 5 5
Boot Space 437 448
Towing Capacity 1200 1200
Specification C-HR Territory
Engine 2.0L HEV Self-Charging Hybrid 1.8L Turbocharged Petrol
Engine Type Inline 4-cylinder M20A-FXS Hybrid Inline 4 Turbocharged
Displacement 1987 1798
Cylinders 4 4
Valves per Cylinder 4 4
Power 135 140
Torque 185 320
Fuel System Multi-Point Fuel Injection Direct Injection
Top Speed 180 185
0-100 km/h 8.5 9.8
Power @ RPM 5200 rpm -
Torque @ RPM 4000 rpm -
Turbocharger Not Available -

Final Verdict

🏆 Ford Territory wins with 68 pts vs 67 pts for C-HR

In structured scoring, Territory emerges as the stronger overall package. However, C-HR may appeal to buyers prioritising different factors. Ultimately, the right choice depends on your driving priorities in South Africa.

People Also Compare

Popular comparisons among buyers considering similar options.

Frequently Asked Questions

Based on structured category scoring, Territory performs better overall in South Africa. However, final choice depends on driving priorities.

C-HR scores 12 while Territory scores 8 in efficiency. Real-world mileage may vary based on driving conditions.

In safety scoring, C-HR scores 20 and Territory scores 18. Both offer competitive safety packages in this segment.

C-HR scores 12 versus Territory scoring 16. Warranty coverage and ownership value influence this result.

Practicality scoring gives C-HR 12 and Territory 13, reflecting cabin space and usability.

Performance category shows C-HR scoring 11 compared to Territory scoring 13, indicating stronger overtaking capability.

While resale depends on market demand, ownership and brand positioning suggest Territory may hold stronger long-term value.

Off-road suitability depends on drivetrain and ground clearance. Refer to the full specification comparison for detailed technical differences.

Efficiency and ownership categories influence running costs. Territory performs slightly stronger overall in structured scoring.

Value depends on feature set, performance and ownership coverage. Structured comparison gives Territory the overall advantage.

Detailed Comparison Analysis

The comparison between C-HR and Territory in South Africa evaluates performance, efficiency, safety, practicality and long-term ownership value.

Performance: C-HR scores 11 vs 13.

Efficiency: C-HR scores 12 vs 8.

Safety: C-HR scores 20 vs 18.

Practicality: C-HR scores 12 vs 13.

Ownership: C-HR scores 12 vs 16.

Final structured scoring gives Territory the advantage in this comparison.