Toyota C-HR vs Nissan Qashqai

In-depth comparison in South Africa covering price, performance, fuel efficiency, safety, practicality and long-term ownership costs.

Toyota C-HR in South Africa

Toyota C-HR

2.0 HEV GR Sport CVT Hybrid Automatic
ZAR 499,000 ex-showroom
⚡ 135 kW (181 hp)
🔧 185 Nm
⛽ 18.0 km/l
VS
Nissan Qashqai in South Africa

Nissan Qashqai

1.3 Tekna CVT Petrol Automatic
ZAR 545,000 ex-showroom
⚡ 110 kW (148 hp)
🔧 270 Nm
⛽ 17 km/l
+
＋

Add a 3rd car to compare

Quick Winners

⚡ Performance C-HR
⛽ Mileage Qashqai
🔑 Ownership Tie

Overall Comparison Score

🏆 Winner
#1

C-HR

67
/ 100
+1
pts
#2

Qashqai

66
/ 100

Very close match. Final decision depends on buyer preference.

Executive Summary

Both C-HR and Qashqai are extremely closely matched, making the final choice dependent on buyer preference.

Key Differences At A Glance

Performance C-HR +1 pts
Efficiency Qashqai +1 pts
Safety C-HR +2 pts
Practicality Qashqai +1 pts
Ownership Equal

Category Score Breakdown

🏆 Overall Winner

C-HR

Performance 11/20
Efficiency 12/20
Safety 20/20
Practicality 12/20
Ownership 12/20

Qashqai

Performance 10/20
Efficiency 13/20
Safety 18/20
Practicality 13/20
Ownership 12/20

Pros & Cons

🏆 Overall Winner

C-HR

Pros
  • More powerful engine output
  • Stronger safety package
Cons
  • Lower fuel efficiency
  • Less practical in daily usage
Best For: Highway Driving

Qashqai

Pros
  • Better fuel efficiency
  • More practical for daily use
Cons
  • Less powerful engine setup
  • Less comprehensive safety features
Best For: Fuel Efficiency Family Usage

Who Should Buy Which?

C-HR

  • Drivers who prioritise strong highway performance and overtaking power
  • Families prioritising stronger safety equipment

Qashqai

  • Buyers looking for better fuel efficiency
  • Large families needing more practicality and usability

Full Specification Comparison

Specification C-HR Qashqai
Ground Clearance 165 180
Wheelbase 2640 2665
Length 4390 4425
Width 1820 1835
Height 1565 1625
Kerb Weight 1545 1450
Gross Vehicle Weight 1945 1980
Seating Capacity 5 5
Boot Space 437 504
Towing Capacity 1200 1800
Specification C-HR Qashqai
Engine 2.0L HEV Self-Charging Hybrid 1.3L Turbocharged Petrol
Engine Type Inline 4-cylinder M20A-FXS Hybrid Inline 4 Turbo
Displacement 1987 1332
Cylinders 4 4
Valves per Cylinder 4 4
Power 135 110
Torque 185 270
Fuel System Multi-Point Fuel Injection Direct Injection
Top Speed 180 200
0-100 km/h 8.5 8.9
Power @ RPM 5200 rpm -
Torque @ RPM 4000 rpm -
Turbocharger Not Available -

Final Verdict

🏆 Toyota C-HR wins with 67 pts vs 66 pts for Qashqai

In structured scoring, C-HR emerges as the stronger overall package. However, Qashqai may appeal to buyers prioritising different factors. Ultimately, the right choice depends on your driving priorities in South Africa.

Related Comparisons

See how similar cars stack up against each other.

C-HR
C-HR
VS
EcoSport
EcoSport
C-HR vs EcoSport →
C-HR
C-HR
VS
Everest
Everest
C-HR vs Everest →
C-HR
C-HR
VS
Mustang
Mustang
C-HR vs Mustang →
C-HR
C-HR
VS
Puma
Puma
C-HR vs Puma →
C-HR
C-HR
VS
Ranger
Ranger
C-HR vs Ranger →
C-HR
C-HR
VS
Territory
Territory
C-HR vs Territory →
Qashqai
Qashqai
VS
EcoSport
EcoSport
Qashqai vs EcoSport →
Qashqai
Qashqai
VS
Everest
Everest
Qashqai vs Everest →

People Also Compare

Popular comparisons among buyers considering similar options.

C-HR
C-HR
VS
EcoSport
EcoSport
C-HR vs EcoSport →
C-HR
C-HR
VS
Everest
Everest
C-HR vs Everest →
C-HR
C-HR
VS
Puma
Puma
C-HR vs Puma →
C-HR
C-HR
VS
Territory
Territory
C-HR vs Territory →
C-HR
C-HR
VS
CR-V
CR-V
C-HR vs CR-V →
C-HR
C-HR
VS
Elevate
Elevate
C-HR vs Elevate →

Frequently Asked Questions

Based on structured category scoring, C-HR performs better overall in South Africa. However, final choice depends on driving priorities.

C-HR scores 12 while Qashqai scores 13 in efficiency. Real-world mileage may vary based on driving conditions.

In safety scoring, C-HR scores 20 and Qashqai scores 18. Both offer competitive safety packages in this segment.

C-HR scores 12 versus Qashqai scoring 12. Warranty coverage and ownership value influence this result.

Practicality scoring gives C-HR 12 and Qashqai 13, reflecting cabin space and usability.

Performance category shows C-HR scoring 11 compared to Qashqai scoring 10, indicating stronger overtaking capability.

While resale depends on market demand, ownership and brand positioning suggest C-HR may hold stronger long-term value.

Off-road suitability depends on drivetrain and ground clearance. Refer to the full specification comparison for detailed technical differences.

Efficiency and ownership categories influence running costs. C-HR performs slightly stronger overall in structured scoring.

Value depends on feature set, performance and ownership coverage. Structured comparison gives C-HR the overall advantage.

Detailed Comparison Analysis

The comparison between C-HR and Qashqai in South Africa evaluates performance, efficiency, safety, practicality and long-term ownership value.

Performance: C-HR scores 11 vs 10.

Efficiency: C-HR scores 12 vs 13.

Safety: C-HR scores 20 vs 18.

Practicality: C-HR scores 12 vs 13.

Ownership: C-HR scores 12 vs 12.

Final structured scoring gives C-HR the advantage in this comparison.