Toyota C-HR vs Honda HR-V

In-depth comparison in South Africa covering price, performance, fuel efficiency, safety, practicality and long-term ownership costs.

Toyota C-HR in South Africa

Toyota C-HR

2.0 HEV GR Sport CVT Hybrid Automatic
ZAR 499,000 ex-showroom
⚡ 135 kW (181 hp)
🔧 185 Nm
⛽ 18.0 km/l
VS
Honda HR-V in South Africa

Honda HR-V

1.5 Elegance CVT Petrol Automatic
ZAR 529,900 ex-showroom
⚡ 119 kW (160 hp)
🔧 145 Nm
⛽ 16.0 km/l
+

Add a 3rd car to compare

Quick Winners

Performance C-HR
Mileage C-HR
🔑 Ownership Tie

Overall Comparison Score

🏆 Winner
#1

C-HR

67
/ 100
+5
pts
#2

HR-V

62
/ 100

Very close match. Final decision depends on buyer preference.

Executive Summary

Both C-HR and HR-V are extremely closely matched, making the final choice dependent on buyer preference.

Key Differences At A Glance

Performance C-HR +2 pts
Efficiency C-HR +2 pts
Safety C-HR +2 pts
Practicality HR-V +1 pts
Ownership Equal

Category Score Breakdown

🏆 Overall Winner

C-HR

Performance 11/20
Efficiency 12/20
Safety 20/20
Practicality 12/20
Ownership 12/20

HR-V

Performance 9/20
Efficiency 10/20
Safety 18/20
Practicality 13/20
Ownership 12/20

Pros & Cons

🏆 Overall Winner

C-HR

Pros
  • More powerful engine output
  • Better fuel efficiency
  • Stronger safety package
Cons
  • Less practical in daily usage
Best For: Highway Driving Fuel Efficiency

HR-V

Pros
  • More practical for daily use
Cons
  • Less powerful engine setup
  • Lower fuel efficiency
  • Less comprehensive safety features
Best For: Family Usage

Who Should Buy Which?

C-HR

  • Drivers who prioritise strong highway performance and overtaking power
  • Buyers looking for better fuel efficiency
  • Families prioritising stronger safety equipment

HR-V

  • Large families needing more practicality and usability

Full Specification Comparison

Specification C-HR HR-V
Ground Clearance 165 196
Wheelbase 2640 2610
Length 4390 4340
Width 1820 1790
Height 1565 1590
Kerb Weight 1545 1360
Gross Vehicle Weight 1945 1780
Seating Capacity 5 5
Boot Space 437 437
Towing Capacity 1200 1200
Specification C-HR HR-V
Engine 2.0L HEV Self-Charging Hybrid 1.5L i-VTEC Petrol
Engine Type Inline 4-cylinder M20A-FXS Hybrid Inline 4 Cylinder Naturally Aspirated
Displacement 1987 1498
Cylinders 4 4
Valves per Cylinder 4 4
Power 135 119
Torque 185 145
Fuel System Multi-Point Fuel Injection Multi-Point Fuel Injection
Top Speed 180 185
0-100 km/h 8.5 11.5
Power @ RPM 5200 rpm -
Torque @ RPM 4000 rpm -
Turbocharger Not Available -

Final Verdict

🏆 Toyota C-HR wins with 67 pts vs 62 pts for HR-V

In structured scoring, C-HR emerges as the stronger overall package. However, HR-V may appeal to buyers prioritising different factors. Ultimately, the right choice depends on your driving priorities in South Africa.

People Also Compare

Popular comparisons among buyers considering similar options.

Frequently Asked Questions

Based on structured category scoring, C-HR performs better overall in South Africa. However, final choice depends on driving priorities.

C-HR scores 12 while HR-V scores 10 in efficiency. Real-world mileage may vary based on driving conditions.

In safety scoring, C-HR scores 20 and HR-V scores 18. Both offer competitive safety packages in this segment.

C-HR scores 12 versus HR-V scoring 12. Warranty coverage and ownership value influence this result.

Practicality scoring gives C-HR 12 and HR-V 13, reflecting cabin space and usability.

Performance category shows C-HR scoring 11 compared to HR-V scoring 9, indicating stronger overtaking capability.

While resale depends on market demand, ownership and brand positioning suggest C-HR may hold stronger long-term value.

Off-road suitability depends on drivetrain and ground clearance. Refer to the full specification comparison for detailed technical differences.

Efficiency and ownership categories influence running costs. C-HR performs slightly stronger overall in structured scoring.

Value depends on feature set, performance and ownership coverage. Structured comparison gives C-HR the overall advantage.

Detailed Comparison Analysis

The comparison between C-HR and HR-V in South Africa evaluates performance, efficiency, safety, practicality and long-term ownership value.

Performance: C-HR scores 11 vs 9.

Efficiency: C-HR scores 12 vs 10.

Safety: C-HR scores 20 vs 18.

Practicality: C-HR scores 12 vs 13.

Ownership: C-HR scores 12 vs 12.

Final structured scoring gives C-HR the advantage in this comparison.