Toyota C-HR vs Honda CR-V

In-depth comparison in South Africa covering price, performance, fuel efficiency, safety, practicality and long-term ownership costs.

Toyota C-HR in South Africa

Toyota C-HR

2.0 HEV GR Sport CVT Hybrid Automatic
ZAR 499,000 ex-showroom
⚡ 135 kW (181 hp)
🔧 185 Nm
⛽ 18.0 km/l
VS
Honda CR-V in South Africa

Honda CR-V

2.0 Hybrid e:HEV Hybrid Automatic
ZAR 819,900 ex-showroom
⚡ 204 kW (274 hp)
🔧 335 Nm
⛽ 20 km/l
+

Add a 3rd car to compare

Quick Winners

Performance CR-V
Mileage CR-V
🔑 Ownership Tie

Overall Comparison Score

🏆 Winner
#1

CR-V

77
/ 100
+10
pts
#2

C-HR

67
/ 100

Moderate difference between the models.

Executive Summary

CR-V has a slight advantage, but C-HR remains highly competitive.

Key Differences At A Glance

Performance CR-V +6 pts
Efficiency CR-V +4 pts
Safety C-HR +2 pts
Practicality CR-V +2 pts
Ownership Equal

Category Score Breakdown

🏆 Overall Winner

CR-V

Performance 17/20
Efficiency 16/20
Safety 18/20
Practicality 14/20
Ownership 12/20

C-HR

Performance 11/20
Efficiency 12/20
Safety 20/20
Practicality 12/20
Ownership 12/20

Pros & Cons

C-HR

Pros
  • Stronger safety package
Cons
  • Less powerful engine setup
  • Lower fuel efficiency
  • Less practical in daily usage
Best For: General Use
🏆 Overall Winner

CR-V

Pros
  • More powerful engine output
  • Better fuel efficiency
  • More practical for daily use
Cons
  • Less comprehensive safety features
Best For: Highway Driving Fuel Efficiency Family Usage

Who Should Buy Which?

C-HR

  • Families prioritising stronger safety equipment

CR-V

  • Drivers who prioritise strong highway performance and overtaking power
  • Buyers looking for better fuel efficiency
  • Large families needing more practicality and usability

Full Specification Comparison

Specification C-HR CR-V
Ground Clearance 165 200
Wheelbase 2640 2700
Length 4390 4690
Width 1820 1860
Height 1565 1690
Kerb Weight 1545 1750
Gross Vehicle Weight 1945 2250
Seating Capacity 5 5
Boot Space 437 497
Towing Capacity 1200 1500
Specification C-HR CR-V
Engine 2.0L HEV Self-Charging Hybrid 2.0L Hybrid Petrol
Engine Type Inline 4-cylinder M20A-FXS Hybrid Inline 4 Cylinder Atkinson Cycle with Dual Electric Motors
Displacement 1987 1993
Cylinders 4 4
Valves per Cylinder 4 4
Power 135 204
Torque 185 335
Fuel System Multi-Point Fuel Injection Direct Injection + Electric Motor Assist
Top Speed 180 195
0-100 km/h 8.5 8.5
Power @ RPM 5200 rpm -
Torque @ RPM 4000 rpm -
Turbocharger Not Available -

Final Verdict

🏆 Honda CR-V wins with 77 pts vs 67 pts for C-HR

In structured scoring, CR-V emerges as the stronger overall package. However, C-HR may appeal to buyers prioritising different factors. Ultimately, the right choice depends on your driving priorities in South Africa.

People Also Compare

Popular comparisons among buyers considering similar options.

Frequently Asked Questions

Based on structured category scoring, CR-V performs better overall in South Africa. However, final choice depends on driving priorities.

C-HR scores 12 while CR-V scores 16 in efficiency. Real-world mileage may vary based on driving conditions.

In safety scoring, C-HR scores 20 and CR-V scores 18. Both offer competitive safety packages in this segment.

C-HR scores 12 versus CR-V scoring 12. Warranty coverage and ownership value influence this result.

Practicality scoring gives C-HR 12 and CR-V 14, reflecting cabin space and usability.

Performance category shows C-HR scoring 11 compared to CR-V scoring 17, indicating stronger overtaking capability.

While resale depends on market demand, ownership and brand positioning suggest CR-V may hold stronger long-term value.

Off-road suitability depends on drivetrain and ground clearance. Refer to the full specification comparison for detailed technical differences.

Efficiency and ownership categories influence running costs. CR-V performs slightly stronger overall in structured scoring.

Value depends on feature set, performance and ownership coverage. Structured comparison gives CR-V the overall advantage.

Detailed Comparison Analysis

The comparison between C-HR and CR-V in South Africa evaluates performance, efficiency, safety, practicality and long-term ownership value.

Performance: C-HR scores 11 vs 17.

Efficiency: C-HR scores 12 vs 16.

Safety: C-HR scores 20 vs 18.

Practicality: C-HR scores 12 vs 14.

Ownership: C-HR scores 12 vs 12.

Final structured scoring gives CR-V the advantage in this comparison.