Honda Amaze vs Ford Puma

In-depth comparison in South Africa covering price, performance, fuel efficiency, safety, practicality and long-term ownership costs.

Honda Amaze in South Africa

Honda Amaze

1.2 Comfort CVT Petrol Automatic
ZAR 289,900 ex-showroom
⚡ 66 kW (89 hp)
🔧 110 Nm
⛽ 18.2 km/l
VS
Ford Puma in South Africa

Ford Puma

1.0T EcoBoost ST-Line Automatic Petrol Automatic
ZAR 459,900 ex-showroom
⚡ 92 kW (123 hp)
🔧 170 Nm
⛽ 16.4 km/l
+

Add a 3rd car to compare

Quick Winners

Performance Puma
Mileage Amaze
🔑 Ownership Tie

Overall Comparison Score

🏆 Winner
#1

Puma

61
/ 100
+15
pts
#2

Amaze

46
/ 100

Moderate difference between the models.

Executive Summary

Puma holds a noticeable edge over Amaze, especially in key ownership areas.

Key Differences At A Glance

Performance Puma +3 pts
Efficiency Amaze +2 pts
Safety Puma +14 pts
Practicality Equal
Ownership Equal

Category Score Breakdown

🏆 Overall Winner

Puma

Performance 8/20
Efficiency 9/20
Safety 20/20
Practicality 12/20
Ownership 12/20

Amaze

Performance 5/20
Efficiency 11/20
Safety 6/20
Practicality 12/20
Ownership 12/20

Pros & Cons

Amaze

Pros
  • Better fuel efficiency
Cons
  • Less powerful engine setup
  • Less comprehensive safety features
Best For: Fuel Efficiency
🏆 Overall Winner

Puma

Pros
  • More powerful engine output
  • Stronger safety package
Cons
  • Lower fuel efficiency
Best For: Highway Driving

Who Should Buy Which?

Amaze

  • Buyers looking for better fuel efficiency

Puma

  • Drivers who prioritise strong highway performance and overtaking power
  • Families prioritising stronger safety equipment

Full Specification Comparison

Specification Amaze Puma
Ground Clearance 170 170
Wheelbase 2470 2594
Length 3995 4186
Width 1695 1805
Height 1498 1531
Kerb Weight 980 1325
Gross Vehicle Weight 1420 1775
Seating Capacity 5 5
Boot Space 420 456
Towing Capacity 900 1200
Front Track Width - 1541
Rear Track Width - 1534
Turning Radius - 5.4
Specification Amaze Puma
Engine 1.2L i-VTEC Petrol 1.0L EcoBoost Mild Hybrid
Engine Type Inline 4 Cylinder Naturally Aspirated Inline 3 Cylinder Turbo Mild Hybrid
Displacement 1199 999
Cylinders 4 3
Valves per Cylinder 4 4
Power 66 92
Torque 110 170
Fuel System Multi-Point Fuel Injection Direct Injection
Top Speed 170 185
0-100 km/h 14.5 10.5
Power @ RPM - 6000 rpm
Torque @ RPM - 2000-4500 rpm
Turbocharger - Single Turbo
Compression Ratio - 10.5:1
Engine Position - Front Transverse

Final Verdict

🏆 Ford Puma wins with 61 pts vs 46 pts for Amaze

In structured scoring, Puma emerges as the stronger overall package. However, Amaze may appeal to buyers prioritising different factors. Ultimately, the right choice depends on your driving priorities in South Africa.

People Also Compare

Popular comparisons among buyers considering similar options.

Frequently Asked Questions

Based on structured category scoring, Puma performs better overall in South Africa. However, final choice depends on driving priorities.

Amaze scores 11 while Puma scores 9 in efficiency. Real-world mileage may vary based on driving conditions.

In safety scoring, Amaze scores 6 and Puma scores 20. Both offer competitive safety packages in this segment.

Amaze scores 12 versus Puma scoring 12. Warranty coverage and ownership value influence this result.

Practicality scoring gives Amaze 12 and Puma 12, reflecting cabin space and usability.

Performance category shows Amaze scoring 5 compared to Puma scoring 8, indicating stronger overtaking capability.

While resale depends on market demand, ownership and brand positioning suggest Puma may hold stronger long-term value.

Off-road suitability depends on drivetrain and ground clearance. Refer to the full specification comparison for detailed technical differences.

Efficiency and ownership categories influence running costs. Puma performs slightly stronger overall in structured scoring.

Value depends on feature set, performance and ownership coverage. Structured comparison gives Puma the overall advantage.

Detailed Comparison Analysis

The comparison between Amaze and Puma in South Africa evaluates performance, efficiency, safety, practicality and long-term ownership value.

Performance: Amaze scores 5 vs 8.

Efficiency: Amaze scores 11 vs 9.

Safety: Amaze scores 6 vs 20.

Practicality: Amaze scores 12 vs 12.

Ownership: Amaze scores 12 vs 12.

Final structured scoring gives Puma the advantage in this comparison.