Honda Amaze vs Volkswagen Polo

In-depth comparison in South Africa covering price, performance, fuel efficiency, safety, practicality and long-term ownership costs.

Honda Amaze in South Africa

Honda Amaze

1.2 Comfort CVT Petrol Automatic
ZAR 289,900 ex-showroom
⚡ 66 kW (89 hp)
🔧 110 Nm
⛽ 18.2 km/l
VS
Volkswagen Polo in South Africa

Volkswagen Polo

1.4 TSI GTI DSG Petrol Automatic
ZAR 519,900 ex-showroom
⚡ 147 kW (197 hp)
🔧 250 Nm
⛽ 16.4 km/l
+

Add a 3rd car to compare

Quick Winners

Performance Polo
Mileage Amaze
🔑 Ownership Tie

Overall Comparison Score

🏆 Winner
#1

Polo

63
/ 100
+17
pts
#2

Amaze

46
/ 100

Moderate difference between the models.

Executive Summary

Polo holds a noticeable edge over Amaze, especially in key ownership areas.

Key Differences At A Glance

Performance Polo +7 pts
Efficiency Amaze +2 pts
Safety Polo +14 pts
Practicality Amaze +2 pts
Ownership Equal

Category Score Breakdown

🏆 Overall Winner

Polo

Performance 12/20
Efficiency 9/20
Safety 20/20
Practicality 10/20
Ownership 12/20

Amaze

Performance 5/20
Efficiency 11/20
Safety 6/20
Practicality 12/20
Ownership 12/20

Pros & Cons

Amaze

Pros
  • Better fuel efficiency
  • More practical for daily use
Cons
  • Less powerful engine setup
  • Less comprehensive safety features
Best For: Fuel Efficiency Family Usage
🏆 Overall Winner

Polo

Pros
  • More powerful engine output
  • Stronger safety package
Cons
  • Lower fuel efficiency
  • Less practical in daily usage
Best For: Highway Driving

Who Should Buy Which?

Amaze

  • Buyers looking for better fuel efficiency
  • Large families needing more practicality and usability

Polo

  • Drivers who prioritise strong highway performance and overtaking power
  • Families prioritising stronger safety equipment

Full Specification Comparison

Specification Amaze Polo
Ground Clearance 170 151
Wheelbase 2470 2564
Length 3995 4053
Width 1695 1751
Height 1498 1461
Kerb Weight 980 1105
Gross Vehicle Weight 1420 1530
Seating Capacity 5 5
Boot Space 420 351
Towing Capacity 900 1000
Front Track Width - 1522
Rear Track Width - 1497
Turning Radius - 5.1
Specification Amaze Polo
Engine 1.2L i-VTEC Petrol 1.4L TSI Turbocharged Petrol (GTI)
Engine Type Inline 4 Cylinder Naturally Aspirated Inline 3 Cylinder Turbocharged
Displacement 1199 1395
Cylinders 4 4
Valves per Cylinder 4 4
Power 66 147
Torque 110 250
Fuel System Multi-Point Fuel Injection Direct Injection
Top Speed 170 230
0-100 km/h 14.5 6.7
Power @ RPM - 5000-5500 rpm
Torque @ RPM - 2000-3500 rpm
Turbocharger - Single Turbo
Compression Ratio - 10.5:1
Engine Position - Front Transverse

Final Verdict

🏆 Volkswagen Polo wins with 63 pts vs 46 pts for Amaze

In structured scoring, Polo emerges as the stronger overall package. However, Amaze may appeal to buyers prioritising different factors. Ultimately, the right choice depends on your driving priorities in South Africa.

People Also Compare

Popular comparisons among buyers considering similar options.

Frequently Asked Questions

Based on structured category scoring, Polo performs better overall in South Africa. However, final choice depends on driving priorities.

Amaze scores 11 while Polo scores 9 in efficiency. Real-world mileage may vary based on driving conditions.

In safety scoring, Amaze scores 6 and Polo scores 20. Both offer competitive safety packages in this segment.

Amaze scores 12 versus Polo scoring 12. Warranty coverage and ownership value influence this result.

Practicality scoring gives Amaze 12 and Polo 10, reflecting cabin space and usability.

Performance category shows Amaze scoring 5 compared to Polo scoring 12, indicating stronger overtaking capability.

While resale depends on market demand, ownership and brand positioning suggest Polo may hold stronger long-term value.

Off-road suitability depends on drivetrain and ground clearance. Refer to the full specification comparison for detailed technical differences.

Efficiency and ownership categories influence running costs. Polo performs slightly stronger overall in structured scoring.

Value depends on feature set, performance and ownership coverage. Structured comparison gives Polo the overall advantage.

Detailed Comparison Analysis

The comparison between Amaze and Polo in South Africa evaluates performance, efficiency, safety, practicality and long-term ownership value.

Performance: Amaze scores 5 vs 12.

Efficiency: Amaze scores 11 vs 9.

Safety: Amaze scores 6 vs 20.

Practicality: Amaze scores 12 vs 10.

Ownership: Amaze scores 12 vs 12.

Final structured scoring gives Polo the advantage in this comparison.