Honda Amaze vs Nissan NP300 Hardbody

In-depth comparison in South Africa covering price, performance, fuel efficiency, safety, practicality and long-term ownership costs.

Honda Amaze in South Africa

Honda Amaze

1.2 Comfort CVT Petrol Automatic
ZAR 289,900 ex-showroom
⚡ 66 kW (89 hp)
🔧 110 Nm
⛽ 18.2 km/l
VS
Nissan NP300 Hardbody in South Africa

Nissan NP300 Hardbody

2.5 TDi Double Cab Hi-Rider 4x4 Automatic Diesel Automatic
ZAR 529,900 ex-showroom
⚡ 98 kW (131 hp)
🔧 304 Nm
⛽ 11.4 km/l
+

Add a 3rd car to compare

Quick Winners

Performance NP300 Hardbody
Mileage Amaze
🔑 Ownership Tie

Overall Comparison Score

🏆 Winner
#1

NP300 Hardbody

49
/ 100
+3
pts
#2

Amaze

46
/ 100

Very close match. Final decision depends on buyer preference.

Executive Summary

Both Amaze and NP300 Hardbody are extremely closely matched, making the final choice dependent on buyer preference.

Key Differences At A Glance

Performance NP300 Hardbody +5 pts
Efficiency Amaze +4 pts
Safety NP300 Hardbody +6 pts
Practicality Amaze +4 pts
Ownership Equal

Category Score Breakdown

🏆 Overall Winner

NP300 Hardbody

Performance 10/20
Efficiency 7/20
Safety 12/20
Practicality 8/20
Ownership 12/20

Amaze

Performance 5/20
Efficiency 11/20
Safety 6/20
Practicality 12/20
Ownership 12/20

Pros & Cons

Amaze

Pros
  • Better fuel efficiency
  • More practical for daily use
Cons
  • Less powerful engine setup
  • Less comprehensive safety features
Best For: Fuel Efficiency Family Usage
🏆 Overall Winner

NP300 Hardbody

Pros
  • More powerful engine output
  • Stronger safety package
Cons
  • Lower fuel efficiency
  • Less practical in daily usage
Best For: Highway Driving

Who Should Buy Which?

Amaze

  • Buyers looking for better fuel efficiency
  • Large families needing more practicality and usability

NP300 Hardbody

  • Drivers who prioritise strong highway performance and overtaking power
  • Families prioritising stronger safety equipment

Full Specification Comparison

Specification Amaze NP300 Hardbody
Ground Clearance 170 215
Wheelbase 2470 2500
Length 3995 4875
Width 1695 1760
Height 1498 1655
Kerb Weight 980 1395
Gross Vehicle Weight 1420 2400
Seating Capacity 5 5
Boot Space 420 Not Applicable
Towing Capacity 900 2500
Front Track Width - 1495
Rear Track Width - 1490
Turning Radius - 5.8
Load Bed Length - 1907
Load Bed Width - 1454
Specification Amaze NP300 Hardbody
Engine 1.2L i-VTEC Petrol 2.5L Turbocharged Diesel
Engine Type Inline 4 Cylinder Naturally Aspirated Inline 4 Cylinder Turbocharged
Displacement 1199 2488
Cylinders 4 4
Valves per Cylinder 4 4
Power 66 98
Torque 110 304
Fuel System Multi-Point Fuel Injection Common Rail Direct Injection
Top Speed 170 168
0-100 km/h 14.5 12.5
Power @ RPM - 3600 rpm
Torque @ RPM - 1750-2500 rpm
Turbocharger - Single Turbo
Compression Ratio - 17.5:1
Engine Position - Front Longitudinal

Final Verdict

🏆 Nissan NP300 Hardbody wins with 49 pts vs 46 pts for Amaze

In structured scoring, NP300 Hardbody emerges as the stronger overall package. However, Amaze may appeal to buyers prioritising different factors. Ultimately, the right choice depends on your driving priorities in South Africa.

People Also Compare

Popular comparisons among buyers considering similar options.

Frequently Asked Questions

Based on structured category scoring, NP300 Hardbody performs better overall in South Africa. However, final choice depends on driving priorities.

Amaze scores 11 while NP300 Hardbody scores 7 in efficiency. Real-world mileage may vary based on driving conditions.

In safety scoring, Amaze scores 6 and NP300 Hardbody scores 12. Both offer competitive safety packages in this segment.

Amaze scores 12 versus NP300 Hardbody scoring 12. Warranty coverage and ownership value influence this result.

Practicality scoring gives Amaze 12 and NP300 Hardbody 8, reflecting cabin space and usability.

Performance category shows Amaze scoring 5 compared to NP300 Hardbody scoring 10, indicating stronger overtaking capability.

While resale depends on market demand, ownership and brand positioning suggest NP300 Hardbody may hold stronger long-term value.

Off-road suitability depends on drivetrain and ground clearance. Refer to the full specification comparison for detailed technical differences.

Efficiency and ownership categories influence running costs. NP300 Hardbody performs slightly stronger overall in structured scoring.

Value depends on feature set, performance and ownership coverage. Structured comparison gives NP300 Hardbody the overall advantage.

Detailed Comparison Analysis

The comparison between Amaze and NP300 Hardbody in South Africa evaluates performance, efficiency, safety, practicality and long-term ownership value.

Performance: Amaze scores 5 vs 10.

Efficiency: Amaze scores 11 vs 7.

Safety: Amaze scores 6 vs 12.

Practicality: Amaze scores 12 vs 8.

Ownership: Amaze scores 12 vs 12.

Final structured scoring gives NP300 Hardbody the advantage in this comparison.