Honda Amaze vs Volkswagen Caddy

In-depth comparison in South Africa covering price, performance, fuel efficiency, safety, practicality and long-term ownership costs.

Honda Amaze in South Africa

Honda Amaze

1.2 Comfort CVT Petrol Automatic
ZAR 289,900 ex-showroom
⚡ 66 kW (89 hp)
🔧 110 Nm
⛽ 18.2 km/l
VS
Volkswagen Caddy in South Africa

Volkswagen Caddy

1.6 Panel Van MT Petrol Manual
ZAR 427,200 ex-showroom
⚡ 75 kW (101 hp)
🔧 155 Nm
⛽ 13.5 km/l
+

Add a 3rd car to compare

Quick Winners

Performance Caddy
Mileage Amaze
🔑 Ownership Tie

Overall Comparison Score

🏆 Winner
#1

Caddy

49
/ 100
+3
pts
#2

Amaze

46
/ 100

Very close match. Final decision depends on buyer preference.

Executive Summary

Both Amaze and Caddy are extremely closely matched, making the final choice dependent on buyer preference.

Key Differences At A Glance

Performance Caddy +1 pts
Efficiency Amaze +3 pts
Safety Caddy +6 pts
Practicality Amaze +1 pts
Ownership Equal

Category Score Breakdown

🏆 Overall Winner

Caddy

Performance 6/20
Efficiency 8/20
Safety 12/20
Practicality 11/20
Ownership 12/20

Amaze

Performance 5/20
Efficiency 11/20
Safety 6/20
Practicality 12/20
Ownership 12/20

Pros & Cons

Amaze

Pros
  • Better fuel efficiency
  • More practical for daily use
Cons
  • Less powerful engine setup
  • Less comprehensive safety features
Best For: Fuel Efficiency Family Usage
🏆 Overall Winner

Caddy

Pros
  • More powerful engine output
  • Stronger safety package
Cons
  • Lower fuel efficiency
  • Less practical in daily usage
Best For: Highway Driving

Who Should Buy Which?

Amaze

  • Buyers looking for better fuel efficiency
  • Large families needing more practicality and usability

Caddy

  • Drivers who prioritise strong highway performance and overtaking power
  • Families prioritising stronger safety equipment

Full Specification Comparison

Specification Amaze Caddy
Ground Clearance 170 170
Wheelbase 2470 2755
Length 3995 4499
Width 1695 1794
Height 1498 1832
Kerb Weight 980 1395
Gross Vehicle Weight 1420 2200
Seating Capacity 5 2
Boot Space 420 351
Towing Capacity 900 1000
Front Track Width - 1522
Rear Track Width - 1497
Turning Radius - 5.1
Specification Amaze Caddy
Engine 1.2L i-VTEC Petrol 1.6L MPI Petrol
Engine Type Inline 4 Cylinder Naturally Aspirated Inline 4-cylinder MPI
Displacement 1199 1598
Cylinders 4 3
Valves per Cylinder 4 4
Power 66 75
Torque 110 155
Fuel System Multi-Point Fuel Injection Direct Injection
Top Speed 170 160
0-100 km/h 14.5 14.5
Power @ RPM - 3500 rpm
Torque @ RPM - 3800 rpm
Turbocharger - Not Available
Compression Ratio - 10.5:1
Engine Position - Front Transverse

Final Verdict

🏆 Volkswagen Caddy wins with 49 pts vs 46 pts for Amaze

In structured scoring, Caddy emerges as the stronger overall package. However, Amaze may appeal to buyers prioritising different factors. Ultimately, the right choice depends on your driving priorities in South Africa.

People Also Compare

Popular comparisons among buyers considering similar options.

Frequently Asked Questions

Based on structured category scoring, Caddy performs better overall in South Africa. However, final choice depends on driving priorities.

Amaze scores 11 while Caddy scores 8 in efficiency. Real-world mileage may vary based on driving conditions.

In safety scoring, Amaze scores 6 and Caddy scores 12. Both offer competitive safety packages in this segment.

Amaze scores 12 versus Caddy scoring 12. Warranty coverage and ownership value influence this result.

Practicality scoring gives Amaze 12 and Caddy 11, reflecting cabin space and usability.

Performance category shows Amaze scoring 5 compared to Caddy scoring 6, indicating stronger overtaking capability.

While resale depends on market demand, ownership and brand positioning suggest Caddy may hold stronger long-term value.

Off-road suitability depends on drivetrain and ground clearance. Refer to the full specification comparison for detailed technical differences.

Efficiency and ownership categories influence running costs. Caddy performs slightly stronger overall in structured scoring.

Value depends on feature set, performance and ownership coverage. Structured comparison gives Caddy the overall advantage.

Detailed Comparison Analysis

The comparison between Amaze and Caddy in South Africa evaluates performance, efficiency, safety, practicality and long-term ownership value.

Performance: Amaze scores 5 vs 6.

Efficiency: Amaze scores 11 vs 8.

Safety: Amaze scores 6 vs 12.

Practicality: Amaze scores 12 vs 11.

Ownership: Amaze scores 12 vs 12.

Final structured scoring gives Caddy the advantage in this comparison.