Honda Amaze vs Toyota C-HR

In-depth comparison in South Africa covering price, performance, fuel efficiency, safety, practicality and long-term ownership costs.

Honda Amaze in South Africa

Honda Amaze

1.2 Comfort CVT Petrol Automatic
ZAR 289,900 ex-showroom
⚡ 66 kW (89 hp)
🔧 110 Nm
⛽ 18.2 km/l
VS
Toyota C-HR in South Africa

Toyota C-HR

2.0 HEV GR Sport CVT Hybrid Automatic
ZAR 499,000 ex-showroom
⚡ 135 kW (181 hp)
🔧 185 Nm
⛽ 18.0 km/l
+

Add a 3rd car to compare

Quick Winners

Performance C-HR
Mileage C-HR
🔑 Ownership Tie

Overall Comparison Score

🏆 Winner
#1

C-HR

67
/ 100
+21
pts
#2

Amaze

46
/ 100

Moderate difference between the models.

Executive Summary

C-HR holds a noticeable edge over Amaze, especially in key ownership areas.

Key Differences At A Glance

Performance C-HR +6 pts
Efficiency C-HR +1 pts
Safety C-HR +14 pts
Practicality Equal
Ownership Equal

Category Score Breakdown

🏆 Overall Winner

C-HR

Performance 11/20
Efficiency 12/20
Safety 20/20
Practicality 12/20
Ownership 12/20

Amaze

Performance 5/20
Efficiency 11/20
Safety 6/20
Practicality 12/20
Ownership 12/20

Pros & Cons

Amaze

Pros
  • No major strengths identified
Cons
  • Less powerful engine setup
  • Lower fuel efficiency
  • Less comprehensive safety features
Best For: General Use
🏆 Overall Winner

C-HR

Pros
  • More powerful engine output
  • Better fuel efficiency
  • Stronger safety package
Cons
  • No major weaknesses identified
Best For: Highway Driving Fuel Efficiency

Who Should Buy Which?

Amaze

  • Buyers looking for a balanced all-round vehicle

C-HR

  • Drivers who prioritise strong highway performance and overtaking power
  • Buyers looking for better fuel efficiency
  • Families prioritising stronger safety equipment

Full Specification Comparison

Specification Amaze C-HR
Ground Clearance 170 165
Wheelbase 2470 2640
Length 3995 4390
Width 1695 1820
Height 1498 1565
Kerb Weight 980 1545
Gross Vehicle Weight 1420 1945
Seating Capacity 5 5
Boot Space 420 437
Towing Capacity 900 1200
Specification Amaze C-HR
Engine 1.2L i-VTEC Petrol 2.0L HEV Self-Charging Hybrid
Engine Type Inline 4 Cylinder Naturally Aspirated Inline 4-cylinder M20A-FXS Hybrid
Displacement 1199 1987
Cylinders 4 4
Valves per Cylinder 4 4
Power 66 135
Torque 110 185
Fuel System Multi-Point Fuel Injection Multi-Point Fuel Injection
Top Speed 170 180
0-100 km/h 14.5 8.5
Power @ RPM - 5200 rpm
Torque @ RPM - 4000 rpm
Turbocharger - Not Available

Final Verdict

🏆 Toyota C-HR wins with 67 pts vs 46 pts for Amaze

In structured scoring, C-HR emerges as the stronger overall package. However, Amaze may appeal to buyers prioritising different factors. Ultimately, the right choice depends on your driving priorities in South Africa.

People Also Compare

Popular comparisons among buyers considering similar options.

Frequently Asked Questions

Based on structured category scoring, C-HR performs better overall in South Africa. However, final choice depends on driving priorities.

Amaze scores 11 while C-HR scores 12 in efficiency. Real-world mileage may vary based on driving conditions.

In safety scoring, Amaze scores 6 and C-HR scores 20. Both offer competitive safety packages in this segment.

Amaze scores 12 versus C-HR scoring 12. Warranty coverage and ownership value influence this result.

Practicality scoring gives Amaze 12 and C-HR 12, reflecting cabin space and usability.

Performance category shows Amaze scoring 5 compared to C-HR scoring 11, indicating stronger overtaking capability.

While resale depends on market demand, ownership and brand positioning suggest C-HR may hold stronger long-term value.

Off-road suitability depends on drivetrain and ground clearance. Refer to the full specification comparison for detailed technical differences.

Efficiency and ownership categories influence running costs. C-HR performs slightly stronger overall in structured scoring.

Value depends on feature set, performance and ownership coverage. Structured comparison gives C-HR the overall advantage.

Detailed Comparison Analysis

The comparison between Amaze and C-HR in South Africa evaluates performance, efficiency, safety, practicality and long-term ownership value.

Performance: Amaze scores 5 vs 11.

Efficiency: Amaze scores 11 vs 12.

Safety: Amaze scores 6 vs 20.

Practicality: Amaze scores 12 vs 12.

Ownership: Amaze scores 12 vs 12.

Final structured scoring gives C-HR the advantage in this comparison.