Volkswagen Amarok vs Nissan X-Trail

Amarok

Amarok

VS
X-Trail

X-Trail

Overall Comparison Score

X-Trail

64
๐Ÿ† Winner
7 Point Difference
Very close match. Final decision depends on buyer preference.

Amarok

57

Executive Summary

Both Amarok and X-Trail are extremely closely matched, making the final choice dependent on buyer preference.

Key Differences At A Glance

Performance Amarok (+2)
Efficiency Amarok (+7)
Safety Equal
Practicality X-Trail (+8)
Ownership X-Trail (+8)

Pros & Cons

Amarok

Pros
  • More powerful engine output
  • Better fuel efficiency
Cons
  • Less practical in daily usage
  • Shorter warranty coverage
Best For: Highway Driving Fuel Efficiency
๐Ÿ† Overall Winner

X-Trail

Pros
  • More practical for daily use
  • Better long-term ownership value
Cons
  • Less powerful engine setup
  • Lower fuel efficiency
Best For: Family Usage

Who Should Buy What?

Amarok

  • Drivers who prioritise strong highway performance and overtaking power
  • Buyers looking for better fuel efficiency

X-Trail

  • Large families needing more practicality and usability
  • Long-term owners valuing warranty and ownership peace of mind

Category Breakdown

X-Trail

Performance โ€“ 11/20
Efficiency โ€“ 0/20
Safety โ€“ 18/20
Practicality โ€“ 15/20
Ownership โ€“ 20/20

Amarok

Performance โ€“ 13/20
Efficiency โ€“ 7/20
Safety โ€“ 18/20
Practicality โ€“ 7/20
Ownership โ€“ 12/20

Full Specification Comparison

Spec Amarok X-Trail
Ground Clearance 192 210
Wheelbase 3097 2705
Length 5254 4680
Width 1944 1840
Height 1834 1725
Kerb Weight 2095 1635
Gross Vehicle Weight 3150 2230
Seating Capacity 5 5
Boot Space 0 565
Towing Capacity 3500 1800
Spec Amarok X-Trail
Engine 2.0L TDI Turbo Diesel 2.5L Naturally Aspirated Petrol
Engine Type Inline 4 Turbocharged Intercooled Inline 4-cylinder DOHC
Displacement 1968 2488
Cylinders 4 4
Valves per Cylinder 4 4
Power 125 126
Torque 400 233
Fuel System Common Rail Direct Injection Direct Injection
Turbocharger Twin Turbo -
Top Speed 180 200
0-100 km/h 10.5 10.2

Final Verdict

In structured scoring, X-Trail emerges as the stronger overall package. However, Amarok may appeal to buyers prioritising different factors. Ultimately, the right choice depends on your driving priorities in South Africa.

People Also Compare

Frequently Asked Questions

Based on structured category scoring, X-Trail performs better overall in South Africa. However, final choice depends on driving priorities.

Amarok scores 7 while X-Trail scores 0 in efficiency. Real-world mileage may vary based on driving conditions.

In safety scoring, Amarok scores 18 and X-Trail scores 18. Both offer competitive safety packages in this segment.

Amarok scores 12 versus X-Trail scoring 20. Warranty coverage and ownership value influence this result.

Practicality scoring gives Amarok 7 and X-Trail 15, reflecting cabin space and usability.

Performance category shows Amarok scoring 13 compared to X-Trail scoring 11, indicating stronger overtaking capability.

While resale depends on market demand, ownership and brand positioning suggest X-Trail may hold stronger long-term value.

Off-road suitability depends on drivetrain and ground clearance. Refer to the full specification comparison for detailed technical differences.

Efficiency and ownership categories influence running costs. X-Trail performs slightly stronger overall in structured scoring.

Value depends on feature set, performance and ownership coverage. Structured comparison gives X-Trail the overall advantage.

Detailed Comparison Analysis

The comparison between Amarok and X-Trail in South Africa evaluates performance, efficiency, safety, practicality and long-term ownership value.

Performance: Amarok scores 13 vs 11.

Efficiency: Amarok scores 7 vs 0.

Safety: Amarok scores 18 vs 18.

Practicality: Amarok scores 7 vs 15.

Ownership: Amarok scores 12 vs 20.

Final structured scoring gives X-Trail the advantage in this comparison.

SUVs