Volkswagen Amarok vs Ford Territory

Amarok

Amarok

VS
Territory

Territory

Overall Comparison Score

Territory

68
๐Ÿ† Winner
11 Point Difference
Moderate difference between the two models.

Amarok

57

Executive Summary

Territory has a slight advantage, but Amarok remains highly competitive.

Key Differences At A Glance

Performance Equal
Efficiency Territory (+1)
Safety Equal
Practicality Territory (+6)
Ownership Territory (+4)

Pros & Cons

Amarok

Pros
  • No major strengths
Cons
  • Lower fuel efficiency
  • Less practical in daily usage
  • Shorter warranty coverage
Best For: General Use
๐Ÿ† Overall Winner

Territory

Pros
  • Better fuel efficiency
  • More practical for daily use
  • Better long-term ownership value
Cons
  • No major weaknesses
Best For: Fuel Efficiency Family Usage

Who Should Buy What?

Amarok

  • Buyers looking for a balanced all-round SUV

Territory

  • Buyers looking for better fuel efficiency
  • Large families needing more practicality and usability
  • Long-term owners valuing warranty and ownership peace of mind

Category Breakdown

Territory

Performance โ€“ 13/20
Efficiency โ€“ 8/20
Safety โ€“ 18/20
Practicality โ€“ 13/20
Ownership โ€“ 16/20

Amarok

Performance โ€“ 13/20
Efficiency โ€“ 7/20
Safety โ€“ 18/20
Practicality โ€“ 7/20
Ownership โ€“ 12/20

Full Specification Comparison

Spec Amarok Territory
Ground Clearance 192 190
Wheelbase 3097 2716
Length 5254 4630
Width 1944 1935
Height 1834 1706
Kerb Weight 2095 1635
Gross Vehicle Weight 3150 2150
Seating Capacity 5 5
Boot Space 0 448
Towing Capacity 3500 1200
Spec Amarok Territory
Engine 2.0L TDI Turbo Diesel 1.8L Turbocharged Petrol
Engine Type Inline 4 Turbocharged Intercooled Inline 4 Turbocharged
Displacement 1968 1798
Cylinders 4 4
Valves per Cylinder 4 4
Power 125 140
Torque 400 320
Fuel System Common Rail Direct Injection Direct Injection
Turbocharger Twin Turbo -
Top Speed 180 185
0-100 km/h 10.5 9.8

Final Verdict

In structured scoring, Territory emerges as the stronger overall package. However, Amarok may appeal to buyers prioritising different factors. Ultimately, the right choice depends on your driving priorities in South Africa.

People Also Compare

Frequently Asked Questions

Based on structured category scoring, Territory performs better overall in South Africa. However, final choice depends on driving priorities.

Amarok scores 7 while Territory scores 8 in efficiency. Real-world mileage may vary based on driving conditions.

In safety scoring, Amarok scores 18 and Territory scores 18. Both offer competitive safety packages in this segment.

Amarok scores 12 versus Territory scoring 16. Warranty coverage and ownership value influence this result.

Practicality scoring gives Amarok 7 and Territory 13, reflecting cabin space and usability.

Performance category shows Amarok scoring 13 compared to Territory scoring 13, indicating stronger overtaking capability.

While resale depends on market demand, ownership and brand positioning suggest Territory may hold stronger long-term value.

Off-road suitability depends on drivetrain and ground clearance. Refer to the full specification comparison for detailed technical differences.

Efficiency and ownership categories influence running costs. Territory performs slightly stronger overall in structured scoring.

Value depends on feature set, performance and ownership coverage. Structured comparison gives Territory the overall advantage.

Detailed Comparison Analysis

The comparison between Amarok and Territory in South Africa evaluates performance, efficiency, safety, practicality and long-term ownership value.

Performance: Amarok scores 13 vs 13.

Efficiency: Amarok scores 7 vs 8.

Safety: Amarok scores 18 vs 18.

Practicality: Amarok scores 7 vs 13.

Ownership: Amarok scores 12 vs 16.

Final structured scoring gives Territory the advantage in this comparison.

SUVs