Volkswagen Amarok vs Ford Ranger in South Africa – Comparison

Overall Comparison Score

Ranger

70

🏆 Winner

13 Point Difference

Moderate difference between the two models.

Amarok

57

Executive Summary

Ranger has a slight advantage, but Amarok remains highly competitive.

Key Differences At A Glance

Performance Ranger (+4)

Efficiency Amarok (+1)

Safety Ranger (+2)

Practicality Ranger (+4)

Ownership Ranger (+4)

Pros & Cons

Amarok

Pros

Better fuel efficiency

Cons

Less powerful engine setup
Less comprehensive safety features
Less practical in daily usage
Shorter warranty coverage

Best For: Fuel Efficiency

🏆 Overall Winner

Ranger

Pros

More powerful engine output
Stronger safety package
More practical for daily use
Better long-term ownership value

Cons

Lower fuel efficiency

Best For: Highway Driving Family Usage

Who Should Buy What?

Amarok

Buyers looking for better fuel efficiency

Ranger

Drivers who prioritise strong highway performance and overtaking power
Families prioritising stronger safety equipment
Large families needing more practicality and usability
Long-term owners valuing warranty and ownership peace of mind

Category Breakdown

Ranger

Performance – 17/20

Efficiency – 6/20

Safety – 20/20

Practicality – 11/20

Ownership – 16/20

Amarok

Performance – 13/20

Efficiency – 7/20

Safety – 18/20

Practicality – 7/20

Ownership – 12/20

Full Specification Comparison

Spec	Amarok	Ranger
Ground Clearance	192	283
Wheelbase	3097	3270
Length	5254	5381
Width	1944	2180
Height	1834	1922
Kerb Weight	2095	2345
Gross Vehicle Weight	3150	3130
Seating Capacity	5	5
Boot Space	0	0
Towing Capacity	3500	2500

Spec	Amarok	Ranger
Engine	2.0L TDI Turbo Diesel	2.0L Bi-Turbo Diesel
Engine Type	Inline 4 Turbocharged Intercooled	Inline 4 Twin Turbocharged Intercooled
Displacement	1968	1996
Cylinders	4	4
Valves per Cylinder	4	4
Power	125	157
Torque	400	500
Fuel System	Common Rail Direct Injection	Common Rail Direct Injection
Turbocharger	Twin Turbo	-
Top Speed	180	180
0-100 km/h	10.5	10.2

Spec	Amarok	Ranger
Transmission	8-Speed Automatic	10-Speed Automatic with Paddle Shift
Drive Type	4Motion AWD	4x4
Drivetrain Layout	Selectable 4WD	Full-Time 4WD
LSD Available	Electronic Rear Differential Lock	Electronic Locking Rear Differential
Transfer Case	High and Low Range	Electronic Two-Speed Transfer Case

Spec	Amarok	Ranger
Traction Control	Standard	Standard
Electronic Stability Control	Standard	Standard
Airbags	6	7
ABS	Standard	Standard
Brake Assist	Standard	Standard
Hill Descent Control	Standard	Standard
ISOFIX Mounts	Standard	Standard
Child Safety Lock	Standard	Standard
Engine Immobiliser	Standard	Standard
Alarm System	Standard	-
Tyre Pressure Monitor	Standard	Standard

Spec	Amarok	Ranger
Claimed Mileage	12.8	12.8
City Mileage	9	8
Highway Mileage	13	11
Fuel Tank Capacity	80	80
Emission Standard	Euro 5	Euro 5

Spec	Amarok	Ranger
CO2 Emissions	225	220
Start Stop System	Yes	Standard
Hybrid System Type	None	None

Spec	Amarok	Ranger
Cruise Control	Standard	Standard
Adaptive Cruise Control	Not Available	Standard
Lane Keep Assist	Not Available	Standard
Blind Spot Monitoring	Not Available	Standard
Rear Cross Traffic Alert	Not Available	Standard
Parking Sensors	Front and Rear	Front and Rear
Rear View Camera	Standard	Standard
360 Degree Camera	Not Available	Standard
Autonomous Emergency Braking	Not Available	Standard

Spec	Amarok	Ranger
Seat Material	Fabric	Raptor Leather and Suede
Seat Adjustment	Manual	Power Driver and Passenger
Heated Seats	Not Available	Standard
Ventilated Seats	Not Available	Standard
Steering Type	Power Assisted	Electric Power Steering
Steering Adjustment	Tilt and Telescopic	Tilt and Telescopic
Ambient Lighting	Not Available	Multi-Colour Ambient Lighting

Spec	Amarok	Ranger
Climate Control	Automatic	Dual Zone Automatic
Power Windows	Front and Rear	All Windows
Keyless Entry	Remote Key	Smart Key
Push Button Start	Not Available	Standard
Wireless Charging	Not Available	Standard
Sunroof	Not Available	Not Available
Electric Tailgate	Not Available	Power Assisted Tailgate

Spec	Amarok	Ranger
Infotainment Screen	8-inch Touchscreen	12-inch Touchscreen with SYNC 4
Apple CarPlay	Standard	Wireless
Android Auto	Standard	Wireless
Bluetooth Connectivity	Standard	Standard
USB Ports	Front and Rear	-
Number of Speakers	6	10
Navigation System	Optional	Integrated GPS Navigation
Digital Instrument Cluster	Not Available	-

Spec	Amarok	Ranger
LED Headlamps	Halogen Projector	Matrix LED with Adaptive Beam
Daytime Running Lamps	LED	LED
Fog Lamps	Front	LED
Roof Rails	Not Available	Heavy Duty Roof Rails
Alloy Wheel Design	17-inch Alloy	17-inch Raptor Off-road Alloy

Spec	Amarok	Ranger
Approach Angle	29	32
Departure Angle	24	24
Wading Depth	500	850
Terrain Modes	Offroad Mode	Normal
Locking Differential	Electronic Rear Lock	Electronic Rear Lock

Spec	Amarok	Ranger
Tyre Size	255/65 R17	285/70 R17 All-Terrain
Wheel Type	Alloy	Alloy
Front Brake Type	Ventilated Disc	Ventilated Disc
Rear Brake Type	Drum	Disc

Spec	Amarok	Ranger
Front Suspension	Double Wishbone	FOX Racing Shocks with Aluminium Control Arms
Rear Suspension	Leaf Spring	FOX Racing Shocks with Watt Link
Chassis Type	Ladder Frame	Reinforced Ladder Frame

Spec	Amarok	Ranger
Service Interval	15000 km / 12 months	15000 km / 12 months
Approx Service Cost	Moderate	Premium
Battery Warranty	24 Months	24 Months

Spec	Amarok	Ranger
Warranty Years	3	4
Warranty Kilometers	120000	120000
Roadside Assistance	3 Years	4 Years

Final Verdict

In structured scoring, Ranger emerges as the stronger overall package. However, Amarok may appeal to buyers prioritising different factors. Ultimately, the right choice depends on your driving priorities in South Africa.

Related Comparisons

People Also Compare

Frequently Asked Questions

Based on structured category scoring, Ranger performs better overall in South Africa. However, final choice depends on driving priorities.

Amarok scores 7 while Ranger scores 6 in efficiency. Real-world mileage may vary based on driving conditions.

In safety scoring, Amarok scores 18 and Ranger scores 20. Both offer competitive safety packages in this segment.

Amarok scores 12 versus Ranger scoring 16. Warranty coverage and ownership value influence this result.

Practicality scoring gives Amarok 7 and Ranger 11, reflecting cabin space and usability.

Performance category shows Amarok scoring 13 compared to Ranger scoring 17, indicating stronger overtaking capability.

While resale depends on market demand, ownership and brand positioning suggest Ranger may hold stronger long-term value.

Off-road suitability depends on drivetrain and ground clearance. Refer to the full specification comparison for detailed technical differences.

Efficiency and ownership categories influence running costs. Ranger performs slightly stronger overall in structured scoring.

Value depends on feature set, performance and ownership coverage. Structured comparison gives Ranger the overall advantage.

Detailed Comparison Analysis

The comparison between Amarok and Ranger in South Africa evaluates performance, efficiency, safety, practicality and long-term ownership value.

Performance: Amarok scores 13 vs 17.

Efficiency: Amarok scores 7 vs 6.

Safety: Amarok scores 18 vs 20.

Practicality: Amarok scores 7 vs 11.

Ownership: Amarok scores 12 vs 16.

Final structured scoring gives Ranger the advantage in this comparison.