Volkswagen Amarok vs Nissan NP200

In-depth comparison in South Africa covering price, performance, fuel efficiency, safety, practicality and long-term ownership costs.

Volkswagen Amarok in South Africa

Volkswagen Amarok

3.0 V6 TDI Double Cab Aventura 4Motion AT Diesel Automatic
ZAR 1,252,200 ex-showroom
⚡ 125 kW (168 hp)
🔧 400 Nm
⛽ 12.8 km/l
VS
Nissan NP200 in South Africa

Nissan NP200

1.6 Safety Pack Manual Petrol Manual
ZAR 284,900 ex-showroom
⚡ 65 kW (87 hp)
🔧 147 Nm
⛽ 12.5 km/l
+

Add a 3rd car to compare

Quick Winners

Performance Amarok
Mileage NP200
🔑 Ownership Tie

Overall Comparison Score

🏆 Winner
#1

Amarok

57
/ 100
+12
pts
#2

NP200

45
/ 100

Moderate difference between the models.

Executive Summary

Amarok has a slight advantage, but NP200 remains highly competitive.

Key Differences At A Glance

Performance Amarok +7 pts
Efficiency NP200 +1 pts
Safety Amarok +6 pts
Practicality Equal
Ownership Equal

Category Score Breakdown

🏆 Overall Winner

Amarok

Performance 13/20
Efficiency 7/20
Safety 18/20
Practicality 7/20
Ownership 12/20

NP200

Performance 6/20
Efficiency 8/20
Safety 12/20
Practicality 7/20
Ownership 12/20

Pros & Cons

🏆 Overall Winner

Amarok

Pros
  • More powerful engine output
  • Stronger safety package
Cons
  • Lower fuel efficiency
Best For: Highway Driving

NP200

Pros
  • Better fuel efficiency
Cons
  • Less powerful engine setup
  • Less comprehensive safety features
Best For: Fuel Efficiency

Who Should Buy Which?

Amarok

  • Drivers who prioritise strong highway performance and overtaking power
  • Families prioritising stronger safety equipment

NP200

  • Buyers looking for better fuel efficiency

Full Specification Comparison

Specification Amarok NP200
Ground Clearance 192 185
Wheelbase 3097 2400
Length 5254 4535
Width 1944 1615
Height 1834 1530
Kerb Weight 2095 915
Gross Vehicle Weight 3150 1570
Seating Capacity 5 2
Boot Space 0 Not Applicable
Towing Capacity 3500 500
Front Track Width - 1390
Rear Track Width - 1385
Turning Radius - 5.5
Load Bed Length - 1815
Load Bed Width - 1530
Specification Amarok NP200
Engine 2.0L TDI Turbo Diesel 1.6L Naturally Aspirated Petrol
Engine Type Inline 4 Turbocharged Intercooled Inline 4 Cylinder
Displacement 1968 1598
Cylinders 4 4
Valves per Cylinder 4 4
Power 125 65
Torque 400 147
Fuel System Common Rail Direct Injection Multi-Point Injection
Turbocharger Twin Turbo Not Available
Top Speed 180 155
0-100 km/h 10.5 14.5
Power @ RPM - 5200 rpm
Torque @ RPM - 2800 rpm
Compression Ratio - 9.5:1
Engine Position - Front Longitudinal

Final Verdict

🏆 Volkswagen Amarok wins with 57 pts vs 45 pts for NP200

In structured scoring, Amarok emerges as the stronger overall package. However, NP200 may appeal to buyers prioritising different factors. Ultimately, the right choice depends on your driving priorities in South Africa.

People Also Compare

Popular comparisons among buyers considering similar options.

Frequently Asked Questions

Based on structured category scoring, Amarok performs better overall in South Africa. However, final choice depends on driving priorities.

Amarok scores 7 while NP200 scores 8 in efficiency. Real-world mileage may vary based on driving conditions.

In safety scoring, Amarok scores 18 and NP200 scores 12. Both offer competitive safety packages in this segment.

Amarok scores 12 versus NP200 scoring 12. Warranty coverage and ownership value influence this result.

Practicality scoring gives Amarok 7 and NP200 7, reflecting cabin space and usability.

Performance category shows Amarok scoring 13 compared to NP200 scoring 6, indicating stronger overtaking capability.

While resale depends on market demand, ownership and brand positioning suggest Amarok may hold stronger long-term value.

Off-road suitability depends on drivetrain and ground clearance. Refer to the full specification comparison for detailed technical differences.

Efficiency and ownership categories influence running costs. Amarok performs slightly stronger overall in structured scoring.

Value depends on feature set, performance and ownership coverage. Structured comparison gives Amarok the overall advantage.

Detailed Comparison Analysis

The comparison between Amarok and NP200 in South Africa evaluates performance, efficiency, safety, practicality and long-term ownership value.

Performance: Amarok scores 13 vs 6.

Efficiency: Amarok scores 7 vs 8.

Safety: Amarok scores 18 vs 12.

Practicality: Amarok scores 7 vs 7.

Ownership: Amarok scores 12 vs 12.

Final structured scoring gives Amarok the advantage in this comparison.