Volkswagen Amarok vs Ford Mustang

In-depth comparison in South Africa covering price, performance, fuel efficiency, safety, practicality and long-term ownership costs.

Volkswagen Amarok in South Africa

Volkswagen Amarok

3.0 V6 TDI Double Cab Aventura 4Motion AT Diesel Automatic
ZAR 1,252,200 ex-showroom
⚡ 125 kW (168 hp)
🔧 400 Nm
⛽ 12.8 km/l
VS
Ford Mustang in South Africa

Ford Mustang

5.0 GT Premium Convertible Automatic Petrol Automatic
ZAR 1,449,900 ex-showroom
⚡ 338 kW (453 hp)
🔧 515 Nm
⛽ 9.1 km/l
+

Add a 3rd car to compare

Quick Winners

Performance Mustang
Mileage Amarok
🔑 Ownership Tie

Overall Comparison Score

🏆 Winner
#1

Mustang

67
/ 100
+10
pts
#2

Amarok

57
/ 100

Moderate difference between the models.

Executive Summary

Mustang has a slight advantage, but Amarok remains highly competitive.

Key Differences At A Glance

Performance Mustang +7 pts
Efficiency Amarok +2 pts
Safety Mustang +2 pts
Practicality Mustang +3 pts
Ownership Equal

Category Score Breakdown

🏆 Overall Winner

Mustang

Performance 20/20
Efficiency 5/20
Safety 20/20
Practicality 10/20
Ownership 12/20

Amarok

Performance 13/20
Efficiency 7/20
Safety 18/20
Practicality 7/20
Ownership 12/20

Pros & Cons

Amarok

Pros
  • Better fuel efficiency
Cons
  • Less powerful engine setup
  • Less comprehensive safety features
  • Less practical in daily usage
Best For: Fuel Efficiency
🏆 Overall Winner

Mustang

Pros
  • More powerful engine output
  • Stronger safety package
  • More practical for daily use
Cons
  • Lower fuel efficiency
Best For: Highway Driving Family Usage

Who Should Buy Which?

Amarok

  • Buyers looking for better fuel efficiency

Mustang

  • Drivers who prioritise strong highway performance and overtaking power
  • Families prioritising stronger safety equipment
  • Large families needing more practicality and usability

Full Specification Comparison

Specification Amarok Mustang
Ground Clearance 192 134
Wheelbase 3097 2720
Length 5254 4788
Width 1944 1916
Height 1834 1381
Kerb Weight 2095 1815
Gross Vehicle Weight 3150 2245
Seating Capacity 5 4
Boot Space 0 408
Towing Capacity 3500 Not Rated
Front Track Width - 1617
Rear Track Width - 1607
Turning Radius - 6.1
Specification Amarok Mustang
Engine 2.0L TDI Turbo Diesel 5.0L Coyote V8 Petrol
Engine Type Inline 4 Turbocharged Intercooled V8 DOHC Naturally Aspirated
Displacement 1968 4951
Cylinders 4 8
Valves per Cylinder 4 4
Power 125 338
Torque 400 515
Fuel System Common Rail Direct Injection Direct Injection
Turbocharger Twin Turbo Not Available
Top Speed 180 250
0-100 km/h 10.5 4.6
Power @ RPM - 7300 rpm
Torque @ RPM - 4250 rpm
Compression Ratio - 12.0:1
Engine Position - Front Longitudinal

Final Verdict

🏆 Ford Mustang wins with 67 pts vs 57 pts for Amarok

In structured scoring, Mustang emerges as the stronger overall package. However, Amarok may appeal to buyers prioritising different factors. Ultimately, the right choice depends on your driving priorities in South Africa.

People Also Compare

Popular comparisons among buyers considering similar options.

Frequently Asked Questions

Based on structured category scoring, Mustang performs better overall in South Africa. However, final choice depends on driving priorities.

Amarok scores 7 while Mustang scores 5 in efficiency. Real-world mileage may vary based on driving conditions.

In safety scoring, Amarok scores 18 and Mustang scores 20. Both offer competitive safety packages in this segment.

Amarok scores 12 versus Mustang scoring 12. Warranty coverage and ownership value influence this result.

Practicality scoring gives Amarok 7 and Mustang 10, reflecting cabin space and usability.

Performance category shows Amarok scoring 13 compared to Mustang scoring 20, indicating stronger overtaking capability.

While resale depends on market demand, ownership and brand positioning suggest Mustang may hold stronger long-term value.

Off-road suitability depends on drivetrain and ground clearance. Refer to the full specification comparison for detailed technical differences.

Efficiency and ownership categories influence running costs. Mustang performs slightly stronger overall in structured scoring.

Value depends on feature set, performance and ownership coverage. Structured comparison gives Mustang the overall advantage.

Detailed Comparison Analysis

The comparison between Amarok and Mustang in South Africa evaluates performance, efficiency, safety, practicality and long-term ownership value.

Performance: Amarok scores 13 vs 20.

Efficiency: Amarok scores 7 vs 5.

Safety: Amarok scores 18 vs 20.

Practicality: Amarok scores 7 vs 10.

Ownership: Amarok scores 12 vs 12.

Final structured scoring gives Mustang the advantage in this comparison.