Volkswagen Amarok vs Ford EcoSport

Amarok

Amarok

VS
EcoSport

EcoSport

Overall Comparison Score

EcoSport

63
๐Ÿ† Winner
6 Point Difference
Very close match. Final decision depends on buyer preference.

Amarok

57

Executive Summary

Both Amarok and EcoSport are extremely closely matched, making the final choice dependent on buyer preference.

Key Differences At A Glance

Performance Amarok (+5)
Efficiency EcoSport (+2)
Safety Equal
Practicality EcoSport (+5)
Ownership EcoSport (+4)

Pros & Cons

Amarok

Pros
  • More powerful engine output
Cons
  • Lower fuel efficiency
  • Less practical in daily usage
  • Shorter warranty coverage
Best For: Highway Driving
๐Ÿ† Overall Winner

EcoSport

Pros
  • Better fuel efficiency
  • More practical for daily use
  • Better long-term ownership value
Cons
  • Less powerful engine setup
Best For: Fuel Efficiency Family Usage

Who Should Buy What?

Amarok

  • Drivers who prioritise strong highway performance and overtaking power

EcoSport

  • Buyers looking for better fuel efficiency
  • Large families needing more practicality and usability
  • Long-term owners valuing warranty and ownership peace of mind

Category Breakdown

EcoSport

Performance โ€“ 8/20
Efficiency โ€“ 9/20
Safety โ€“ 18/20
Practicality โ€“ 12/20
Ownership โ€“ 16/20

Amarok

Performance โ€“ 13/20
Efficiency โ€“ 7/20
Safety โ€“ 18/20
Practicality โ€“ 7/20
Ownership โ€“ 12/20

Full Specification Comparison

Spec Amarok EcoSport
Ground Clearance 192 200
Wheelbase 3097 2519
Length 5254 4325
Width 1944 1765
Height 1834 1653
Kerb Weight 2095 1290
Gross Vehicle Weight 3150 1740
Seating Capacity 5 5
Boot Space 0 352
Towing Capacity 3500 950
Spec Amarok EcoSport
Engine 2.0L TDI Turbo Diesel 1.0L EcoBoost Turbo Petrol
Engine Type Inline 4 Turbocharged Intercooled Inline 3 Turbocharged
Displacement 1968 998
Cylinders 4 3
Valves per Cylinder 4 4
Power 125 92
Torque 400 170
Fuel System Common Rail Direct Injection Direct Injection
Turbocharger Twin Turbo -
Top Speed 180 185
0-100 km/h 10.5 10.5

Final Verdict

In structured scoring, EcoSport emerges as the stronger overall package. However, Amarok may appeal to buyers prioritising different factors. Ultimately, the right choice depends on your driving priorities in South Africa.

People Also Compare

Frequently Asked Questions

Based on structured category scoring, EcoSport performs better overall in South Africa. However, final choice depends on driving priorities.

Amarok scores 7 while EcoSport scores 9 in efficiency. Real-world mileage may vary based on driving conditions.

In safety scoring, Amarok scores 18 and EcoSport scores 18. Both offer competitive safety packages in this segment.

Amarok scores 12 versus EcoSport scoring 16. Warranty coverage and ownership value influence this result.

Practicality scoring gives Amarok 7 and EcoSport 12, reflecting cabin space and usability.

Performance category shows Amarok scoring 13 compared to EcoSport scoring 8, indicating stronger overtaking capability.

While resale depends on market demand, ownership and brand positioning suggest EcoSport may hold stronger long-term value.

Off-road suitability depends on drivetrain and ground clearance. Refer to the full specification comparison for detailed technical differences.

Efficiency and ownership categories influence running costs. EcoSport performs slightly stronger overall in structured scoring.

Value depends on feature set, performance and ownership coverage. Structured comparison gives EcoSport the overall advantage.

Detailed Comparison Analysis

The comparison between Amarok and EcoSport in South Africa evaluates performance, efficiency, safety, practicality and long-term ownership value.

Performance: Amarok scores 13 vs 8.

Efficiency: Amarok scores 7 vs 9.

Safety: Amarok scores 18 vs 18.

Practicality: Amarok scores 7 vs 12.

Ownership: Amarok scores 12 vs 16.

Final structured scoring gives EcoSport the advantage in this comparison.

SUVs