Toyota Agya vs Ford Territory

In-depth comparison in South Africa covering price, performance, fuel efficiency, safety, practicality and long-term ownership costs.

Toyota Agya in South Africa

Toyota Agya

1.0 XR CVT Petrol Automatic
ZAR 229,900 ex-showroom
⚡ 51 kW (68 hp)
🔧 91 Nm
⛽ 18.0 km/l
VS
Ford Territory in South Africa

Ford Territory

1.8T Dark Edition DCT Petrol Automatic
ZAR 733,000 ex-showroom
⚡ 140 kW (188 hp)
🔧 320 Nm
⛽ 13.5 km/l
+

Add a 3rd car to compare

Quick Winners

Performance Territory
Mileage Agya
🔑 Ownership Territory

Overall Comparison Score

🏆 Winner
#1

Territory

68
/ 100
+20
pts
#2

Agya

48
/ 100

Moderate difference between the models.

Executive Summary

Territory holds a noticeable edge over Agya, especially in key ownership areas.

Key Differences At A Glance

Performance Territory +9 pts
Efficiency Agya +3 pts
Safety Territory +6 pts
Practicality Territory +4 pts
Ownership Territory +4 pts

Category Score Breakdown

🏆 Overall Winner

Territory

Performance 13/20
Efficiency 8/20
Safety 18/20
Practicality 13/20
Ownership 16/20

Agya

Performance 4/20
Efficiency 11/20
Safety 12/20
Practicality 9/20
Ownership 12/20

Pros & Cons

Agya

Pros
  • Better fuel efficiency
Cons
  • Less powerful engine setup
  • Less comprehensive safety features
  • Less practical in daily usage
  • Shorter warranty coverage
Best For: Fuel Efficiency
🏆 Overall Winner

Territory

Pros
  • More powerful engine output
  • Stronger safety package
  • More practical for daily use
  • Better long-term ownership value
Cons
  • Lower fuel efficiency
Best For: Highway Driving Family Usage

Who Should Buy Which?

Agya

  • Buyers looking for better fuel efficiency

Territory

  • Drivers who prioritise strong highway performance and overtaking power
  • Families prioritising stronger safety equipment
  • Large families needing more practicality and usability
  • Long-term owners valuing warranty and ownership peace of mind

Full Specification Comparison

Specification Agya Territory
Ground Clearance 155 190
Wheelbase 2455 2716
Length 3760 4630
Width 1665 1935
Height 1520 1706
Kerb Weight 870 1635
Gross Vehicle Weight 1265 2150
Seating Capacity 5 5
Boot Space 235 448
Towing Capacity Not Rated 1200
Front Track Width 1445 -
Rear Track Width 1430 -
Turning Radius 4.7 -
Specification Agya Territory
Engine 1.0L Naturally Aspirated Petrol 1.8L Turbocharged Petrol
Engine Type Inline 3 Cylinder Inline 4 Turbocharged
Displacement 998 1798
Cylinders 3 4
Valves per Cylinder 4 4
Power 51 140
Power @ RPM 6000 rpm -
Torque 91 320
Torque @ RPM 3600 rpm -
Fuel System Multi-Point Injection Direct Injection
Turbocharger Not Available -
Top Speed 155 185
0-100 km/h 14.0 9.8
Compression Ratio 11.5:1 -
Engine Position Front Transverse -

Final Verdict

🏆 Ford Territory wins with 68 pts vs 48 pts for Agya

In structured scoring, Territory emerges as the stronger overall package. However, Agya may appeal to buyers prioritising different factors. Ultimately, the right choice depends on your driving priorities in South Africa.

People Also Compare

Popular comparisons among buyers considering similar options.

Frequently Asked Questions

Based on structured category scoring, Territory performs better overall in South Africa. However, final choice depends on driving priorities.

Agya scores 11 while Territory scores 8 in efficiency. Real-world mileage may vary based on driving conditions.

In safety scoring, Agya scores 12 and Territory scores 18. Both offer competitive safety packages in this segment.

Agya scores 12 versus Territory scoring 16. Warranty coverage and ownership value influence this result.

Practicality scoring gives Agya 9 and Territory 13, reflecting cabin space and usability.

Performance category shows Agya scoring 4 compared to Territory scoring 13, indicating stronger overtaking capability.

While resale depends on market demand, ownership and brand positioning suggest Territory may hold stronger long-term value.

Off-road suitability depends on drivetrain and ground clearance. Refer to the full specification comparison for detailed technical differences.

Efficiency and ownership categories influence running costs. Territory performs slightly stronger overall in structured scoring.

Value depends on feature set, performance and ownership coverage. Structured comparison gives Territory the overall advantage.

Detailed Comparison Analysis

The comparison between Agya and Territory in South Africa evaluates performance, efficiency, safety, practicality and long-term ownership value.

Performance: Agya scores 4 vs 13.

Efficiency: Agya scores 11 vs 8.

Safety: Agya scores 12 vs 18.

Practicality: Agya scores 9 vs 13.

Ownership: Agya scores 12 vs 16.

Final structured scoring gives Territory the advantage in this comparison.