Toyota Agya vs Volkswagen Polo-Vivo

In-depth comparison in South Africa covering price, performance, fuel efficiency, safety, practicality and long-term ownership costs.

Toyota Agya in South Africa

Toyota Agya

1.0 XR CVT Petrol Automatic
ZAR 229,900 ex-showroom
⚡ 51 kW (68 hp)
🔧 91 Nm
⛽ 18.0 km/l
VS
Volkswagen Polo-Vivo in South Africa

Volkswagen Polo-Vivo

1.0 TSI GT 81kW Manual Petrol Manual
ZAR 363,100 ex-showroom
⚡ 63 kW (84 hp)
🔧 132 Nm
⛽ 16.5 km/l
+

Add a 3rd car to compare

Quick Winners

Performance Polo-Vivo
Mileage Agya
🔑 Ownership Tie

Overall Comparison Score

🏆 Winner
#1

Agya

48
/ 100
+5
pts
#2

Polo-Vivo

43
/ 100

Very close match. Final decision depends on buyer preference.

Executive Summary

Both Agya and Polo-Vivo are extremely closely matched, making the final choice dependent on buyer preference.

Key Differences At A Glance

Performance Polo-Vivo +1 pts
Efficiency Agya +1 pts
Safety Agya +6 pts
Practicality Polo-Vivo +1 pts
Ownership Equal

Category Score Breakdown

🏆 Overall Winner

Agya

Performance 4/20
Efficiency 11/20
Safety 12/20
Practicality 9/20
Ownership 12/20

Polo-Vivo

Performance 5/20
Efficiency 10/20
Safety 6/20
Practicality 10/20
Ownership 12/20

Pros & Cons

🏆 Overall Winner

Agya

Pros
  • Better fuel efficiency
  • Stronger safety package
Cons
  • Less powerful engine setup
  • Less practical in daily usage
Best For: Fuel Efficiency

Polo-Vivo

Pros
  • More powerful engine output
  • More practical for daily use
Cons
  • Lower fuel efficiency
  • Less comprehensive safety features
Best For: Highway Driving Family Usage

Who Should Buy Which?

Agya

  • Buyers looking for better fuel efficiency
  • Families prioritising stronger safety equipment

Polo-Vivo

  • Drivers who prioritise strong highway performance and overtaking power
  • Large families needing more practicality and usability

Full Specification Comparison

Specification Agya Polo-Vivo
Ground Clearance 155 168
Wheelbase 2455 2470
Length 3760 3972
Width 1665 1682
Height 1520 1462
Kerb Weight 870 1050
Gross Vehicle Weight 1265 1560
Seating Capacity 5 5
Boot Space 235 280
Towing Capacity Not Rated 800
Front Track Width 1445 -
Rear Track Width 1430 -
Turning Radius 4.7 -
Specification Agya Polo-Vivo
Engine 1.0L Naturally Aspirated Petrol 1.4L Naturally Aspirated Petrol
Engine Type Inline 3 Cylinder Inline 4 Cylinder
Displacement 998 1390
Cylinders 3 4
Valves per Cylinder 4 4
Power 51 63
Power @ RPM 6000 rpm -
Torque 91 132
Torque @ RPM 3600 rpm -
Fuel System Multi-Point Injection Multi Point Injection
Turbocharger Not Available -
Top Speed 155 177
0-100 km/h 14.0 11.8
Compression Ratio 11.5:1 -
Engine Position Front Transverse -

Final Verdict

🏆 Toyota Agya wins with 48 pts vs 43 pts for Polo-Vivo

In structured scoring, Agya emerges as the stronger overall package. However, Polo-Vivo may appeal to buyers prioritising different factors. Ultimately, the right choice depends on your driving priorities in South Africa.

People Also Compare

Popular comparisons among buyers considering similar options.

Frequently Asked Questions

Based on structured category scoring, Agya performs better overall in South Africa. However, final choice depends on driving priorities.

Agya scores 11 while Polo-Vivo scores 10 in efficiency. Real-world mileage may vary based on driving conditions.

In safety scoring, Agya scores 12 and Polo-Vivo scores 6. Both offer competitive safety packages in this segment.

Agya scores 12 versus Polo-Vivo scoring 12. Warranty coverage and ownership value influence this result.

Practicality scoring gives Agya 9 and Polo-Vivo 10, reflecting cabin space and usability.

Performance category shows Agya scoring 4 compared to Polo-Vivo scoring 5, indicating stronger overtaking capability.

While resale depends on market demand, ownership and brand positioning suggest Agya may hold stronger long-term value.

Off-road suitability depends on drivetrain and ground clearance. Refer to the full specification comparison for detailed technical differences.

Efficiency and ownership categories influence running costs. Agya performs slightly stronger overall in structured scoring.

Value depends on feature set, performance and ownership coverage. Structured comparison gives Agya the overall advantage.

Detailed Comparison Analysis

The comparison between Agya and Polo-Vivo in South Africa evaluates performance, efficiency, safety, practicality and long-term ownership value.

Performance: Agya scores 4 vs 5.

Efficiency: Agya scores 11 vs 10.

Safety: Agya scores 12 vs 6.

Practicality: Agya scores 9 vs 10.

Ownership: Agya scores 12 vs 12.

Final structured scoring gives Agya the advantage in this comparison.