Toyota Agya vs Honda Fit

In-depth comparison in South Africa covering price, performance, fuel efficiency, safety, practicality and long-term ownership costs.

Toyota Agya in South Africa

Toyota Agya

1.0 XR CVT Petrol Automatic
ZAR 229,900 ex-showroom
⚡ 51 kW (68 hp)
🔧 91 Nm
⛽ 18.0 km/l
VS
Honda Fit in South Africa

Honda Fit

1.5 Hybrid e:HEV Hybrid Automatic
ZAR 380,500 ex-showroom
⚡ 109 kW (146 hp)
🔧 253 Nm
⛽ 26 km/l
+

Add a 3rd car to compare

Quick Winners

Performance Fit
Mileage Fit
🔑 Ownership Tie

Overall Comparison Score

🏆 Winner
#1

Fit

69
/ 100
+21
pts
#2

Agya

48
/ 100

Moderate difference between the models.

Executive Summary

Fit holds a noticeable edge over Agya, especially in key ownership areas.

Key Differences At A Glance

Performance Fit +6 pts
Efficiency Fit +9 pts
Safety Fit +6 pts
Practicality Equal
Ownership Equal

Category Score Breakdown

🏆 Overall Winner

Fit

Performance 10/20
Efficiency 20/20
Safety 18/20
Practicality 9/20
Ownership 12/20

Agya

Performance 4/20
Efficiency 11/20
Safety 12/20
Practicality 9/20
Ownership 12/20

Pros & Cons

Agya

Pros
  • No major strengths identified
Cons
  • Less powerful engine setup
  • Lower fuel efficiency
  • Less comprehensive safety features
Best For: General Use
🏆 Overall Winner

Fit

Pros
  • More powerful engine output
  • Better fuel efficiency
  • Stronger safety package
Cons
  • No major weaknesses identified
Best For: Highway Driving Fuel Efficiency

Who Should Buy Which?

Agya

  • Buyers looking for a balanced all-round vehicle

Fit

  • Drivers who prioritise strong highway performance and overtaking power
  • Buyers looking for better fuel efficiency
  • Families prioritising stronger safety equipment

Full Specification Comparison

Specification Agya Fit
Ground Clearance 155 135
Wheelbase 2455 2530
Length 3760 3995
Width 1665 1695
Height 1520 1515
Kerb Weight 870 1150
Gross Vehicle Weight 1265 1550
Seating Capacity 5 5
Boot Space 235 304
Towing Capacity Not Rated 800
Front Track Width 1445 -
Rear Track Width 1430 -
Turning Radius 4.7 -
Specification Agya Fit
Engine 1.0L Naturally Aspirated Petrol 1.5L Hybrid Petrol
Engine Type Inline 3 Cylinder Inline 4 Cylinder Atkinson Cycle with Electric Motor
Displacement 998 1498
Cylinders 3 4
Valves per Cylinder 4 4
Power 51 109
Power @ RPM 6000 rpm -
Torque 91 253
Torque @ RPM 3600 rpm -
Fuel System Multi-Point Injection Direct Injection + Electric Motor Assist
Turbocharger Not Available -
Top Speed 155 175
0-100 km/h 14.0 10.5
Compression Ratio 11.5:1 -
Engine Position Front Transverse -

Final Verdict

🏆 Honda Fit wins with 69 pts vs 48 pts for Agya

In structured scoring, Fit emerges as the stronger overall package. However, Agya may appeal to buyers prioritising different factors. Ultimately, the right choice depends on your driving priorities in South Africa.

People Also Compare

Popular comparisons among buyers considering similar options.

Frequently Asked Questions

Based on structured category scoring, Fit performs better overall in South Africa. However, final choice depends on driving priorities.

Agya scores 11 while Fit scores 20 in efficiency. Real-world mileage may vary based on driving conditions.

In safety scoring, Agya scores 12 and Fit scores 18. Both offer competitive safety packages in this segment.

Agya scores 12 versus Fit scoring 12. Warranty coverage and ownership value influence this result.

Practicality scoring gives Agya 9 and Fit 9, reflecting cabin space and usability.

Performance category shows Agya scoring 4 compared to Fit scoring 10, indicating stronger overtaking capability.

While resale depends on market demand, ownership and brand positioning suggest Fit may hold stronger long-term value.

Off-road suitability depends on drivetrain and ground clearance. Refer to the full specification comparison for detailed technical differences.

Efficiency and ownership categories influence running costs. Fit performs slightly stronger overall in structured scoring.

Value depends on feature set, performance and ownership coverage. Structured comparison gives Fit the overall advantage.

Detailed Comparison Analysis

The comparison between Agya and Fit in South Africa evaluates performance, efficiency, safety, practicality and long-term ownership value.

Performance: Agya scores 4 vs 10.

Efficiency: Agya scores 11 vs 20.

Safety: Agya scores 12 vs 18.

Practicality: Agya scores 9 vs 9.

Ownership: Agya scores 12 vs 12.

Final structured scoring gives Fit the advantage in this comparison.