Toyota Agya vs Ford Everest

In-depth comparison in South Africa covering price, performance, fuel efficiency, safety, practicality and long-term ownership costs.

Toyota Agya in South Africa

Toyota Agya

1.0 XR CVT Petrol Automatic
ZAR 229,900 ex-showroom
⚡ 51 kW (68 hp)
🔧 91 Nm
⛽ 18.0 km/l
VS
Ford Everest in South Africa

Ford Everest

3.0TD V6 Platinum 10AT 4WD Diesel Automatic
ZAR 1,099,900 ex-showroom
⚡ 125 kW (168 hp)
🔧 405 Nm
⛽ 14.0 km/l
+

Add a 3rd car to compare

Quick Winners

Performance Everest
Mileage Agya
🔑 Ownership Everest

Overall Comparison Score

🏆 Winner
#1

Everest

68
/ 100
+20
pts
#2

Agya

48
/ 100

Moderate difference between the models.

Executive Summary

Everest holds a noticeable edge over Agya, especially in key ownership areas.

Key Differences At A Glance

Performance Everest +9 pts
Efficiency Agya +4 pts
Safety Everest +8 pts
Practicality Everest +3 pts
Ownership Everest +4 pts

Category Score Breakdown

🏆 Overall Winner

Everest

Performance 13/20
Efficiency 7/20
Safety 20/20
Practicality 12/20
Ownership 16/20

Agya

Performance 4/20
Efficiency 11/20
Safety 12/20
Practicality 9/20
Ownership 12/20

Pros & Cons

Agya

Pros
  • Better fuel efficiency
Cons
  • Less powerful engine setup
  • Less comprehensive safety features
  • Less practical in daily usage
  • Shorter warranty coverage
Best For: Fuel Efficiency
🏆 Overall Winner

Everest

Pros
  • More powerful engine output
  • Stronger safety package
  • More practical for daily use
  • Better long-term ownership value
Cons
  • Lower fuel efficiency
Best For: Highway Driving Family Usage

Who Should Buy Which?

Agya

  • Buyers looking for better fuel efficiency

Everest

  • Drivers who prioritise strong highway performance and overtaking power
  • Families prioritising stronger safety equipment
  • Large families needing more practicality and usability
  • Long-term owners valuing warranty and ownership peace of mind

Full Specification Comparison

Specification Agya Everest
Ground Clearance 155 220
Wheelbase 2455 2900
Length 3760 4914
Width 1665 1923
Height 1520 1842
Kerb Weight 870 2305
Gross Vehicle Weight 1265 3100
Seating Capacity 5 7
Boot Space 235 259
Towing Capacity Not Rated 3500
Front Track Width 1445 -
Rear Track Width 1430 -
Turning Radius 4.7 -
Specification Agya Everest
Engine 1.0L Naturally Aspirated Petrol 2.0L Single Turbo Diesel
Engine Type Inline 3 Cylinder Inline 4 Turbocharged
Displacement 998 1996
Cylinders 3 4
Valves per Cylinder 4 4
Power 51 125
Power @ RPM 6000 rpm -
Torque 91 405
Torque @ RPM 3600 rpm -
Fuel System Multi-Point Injection Common Rail Direct Injection
Turbocharger Not Available -
Top Speed 155 180
0-100 km/h 14.0 11.5
Compression Ratio 11.5:1 -
Engine Position Front Transverse -

Final Verdict

🏆 Ford Everest wins with 68 pts vs 48 pts for Agya

In structured scoring, Everest emerges as the stronger overall package. However, Agya may appeal to buyers prioritising different factors. Ultimately, the right choice depends on your driving priorities in South Africa.

People Also Compare

Popular comparisons among buyers considering similar options.

Frequently Asked Questions

Based on structured category scoring, Everest performs better overall in South Africa. However, final choice depends on driving priorities.

Agya scores 11 while Everest scores 7 in efficiency. Real-world mileage may vary based on driving conditions.

In safety scoring, Agya scores 12 and Everest scores 20. Both offer competitive safety packages in this segment.

Agya scores 12 versus Everest scoring 16. Warranty coverage and ownership value influence this result.

Practicality scoring gives Agya 9 and Everest 12, reflecting cabin space and usability.

Performance category shows Agya scoring 4 compared to Everest scoring 13, indicating stronger overtaking capability.

While resale depends on market demand, ownership and brand positioning suggest Everest may hold stronger long-term value.

Off-road suitability depends on drivetrain and ground clearance. Refer to the full specification comparison for detailed technical differences.

Efficiency and ownership categories influence running costs. Everest performs slightly stronger overall in structured scoring.

Value depends on feature set, performance and ownership coverage. Structured comparison gives Everest the overall advantage.

Detailed Comparison Analysis

The comparison between Agya and Everest in South Africa evaluates performance, efficiency, safety, practicality and long-term ownership value.

Performance: Agya scores 4 vs 13.

Efficiency: Agya scores 11 vs 7.

Safety: Agya scores 12 vs 20.

Practicality: Agya scores 9 vs 12.

Ownership: Agya scores 12 vs 16.

Final structured scoring gives Everest the advantage in this comparison.