Toyota Agya vs Ford EcoSport

In-depth comparison in South Africa covering price, performance, fuel efficiency, safety, practicality and long-term ownership costs.

Toyota Agya in South Africa

Toyota Agya

1.0 XR CVT Petrol Automatic
ZAR 229,900 ex-showroom
⚡ 51 kW (68 hp)
🔧 91 Nm
⛽ 18.0 km/l
VS
Ford EcoSport in South Africa

Ford EcoSport

1.0 EcoBoost Titanium Automatic Petrol Automatic
ZAR 395,000 ex-showroom
⚡ 92 kW (123 hp)
🔧 170 Nm
⛽ 17.2 km/l
+

Add a 3rd car to compare

Quick Winners

Performance EcoSport
Mileage Agya
🔑 Ownership EcoSport

Overall Comparison Score

🏆 Winner
#1

EcoSport

63
/ 100
+15
pts
#2

Agya

48
/ 100

Moderate difference between the models.

Executive Summary

EcoSport holds a noticeable edge over Agya, especially in key ownership areas.

Key Differences At A Glance

Performance EcoSport +4 pts
Efficiency Agya +2 pts
Safety EcoSport +6 pts
Practicality EcoSport +3 pts
Ownership EcoSport +4 pts

Category Score Breakdown

🏆 Overall Winner

EcoSport

Performance 8/20
Efficiency 9/20
Safety 18/20
Practicality 12/20
Ownership 16/20

Agya

Performance 4/20
Efficiency 11/20
Safety 12/20
Practicality 9/20
Ownership 12/20

Pros & Cons

Agya

Pros
  • Better fuel efficiency
Cons
  • Less powerful engine setup
  • Less comprehensive safety features
  • Less practical in daily usage
  • Shorter warranty coverage
Best For: Fuel Efficiency
🏆 Overall Winner

EcoSport

Pros
  • More powerful engine output
  • Stronger safety package
  • More practical for daily use
  • Better long-term ownership value
Cons
  • Lower fuel efficiency
Best For: Highway Driving Family Usage

Who Should Buy Which?

Agya

  • Buyers looking for better fuel efficiency

EcoSport

  • Drivers who prioritise strong highway performance and overtaking power
  • Families prioritising stronger safety equipment
  • Large families needing more practicality and usability
  • Long-term owners valuing warranty and ownership peace of mind

Full Specification Comparison

Specification Agya EcoSport
Ground Clearance 155 200
Wheelbase 2455 2519
Length 3760 4325
Width 1665 1765
Height 1520 1653
Kerb Weight 870 1290
Gross Vehicle Weight 1265 1740
Seating Capacity 5 5
Boot Space 235 352
Towing Capacity Not Rated 950
Front Track Width 1445 -
Rear Track Width 1430 -
Turning Radius 4.7 -
Specification Agya EcoSport
Engine 1.0L Naturally Aspirated Petrol 1.0L EcoBoost Turbo Petrol
Engine Type Inline 3 Cylinder Inline 3 Turbocharged
Displacement 998 998
Cylinders 3 3
Valves per Cylinder 4 4
Power 51 92
Power @ RPM 6000 rpm -
Torque 91 170
Torque @ RPM 3600 rpm -
Fuel System Multi-Point Injection Direct Injection
Turbocharger Not Available -
Top Speed 155 185
0-100 km/h 14.0 10.5
Compression Ratio 11.5:1 -
Engine Position Front Transverse -

Final Verdict

🏆 Ford EcoSport wins with 63 pts vs 48 pts for Agya

In structured scoring, EcoSport emerges as the stronger overall package. However, Agya may appeal to buyers prioritising different factors. Ultimately, the right choice depends on your driving priorities in South Africa.

People Also Compare

Popular comparisons among buyers considering similar options.

Frequently Asked Questions

Based on structured category scoring, EcoSport performs better overall in South Africa. However, final choice depends on driving priorities.

Agya scores 11 while EcoSport scores 9 in efficiency. Real-world mileage may vary based on driving conditions.

In safety scoring, Agya scores 12 and EcoSport scores 18. Both offer competitive safety packages in this segment.

Agya scores 12 versus EcoSport scoring 16. Warranty coverage and ownership value influence this result.

Practicality scoring gives Agya 9 and EcoSport 12, reflecting cabin space and usability.

Performance category shows Agya scoring 4 compared to EcoSport scoring 8, indicating stronger overtaking capability.

While resale depends on market demand, ownership and brand positioning suggest EcoSport may hold stronger long-term value.

Off-road suitability depends on drivetrain and ground clearance. Refer to the full specification comparison for detailed technical differences.

Efficiency and ownership categories influence running costs. EcoSport performs slightly stronger overall in structured scoring.

Value depends on feature set, performance and ownership coverage. Structured comparison gives EcoSport the overall advantage.

Detailed Comparison Analysis

The comparison between Agya and EcoSport in South Africa evaluates performance, efficiency, safety, practicality and long-term ownership value.

Performance: Agya scores 4 vs 8.

Efficiency: Agya scores 11 vs 9.

Safety: Agya scores 12 vs 18.

Practicality: Agya scores 9 vs 12.

Ownership: Agya scores 12 vs 16.

Final structured scoring gives EcoSport the advantage in this comparison.